<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Midway!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:10:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdsasart</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>birdsasart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>I feel that the 400 DO is far superior to the older 400 f/5.6 for handheld flight photography for two very obvious reasons:  it is a stop faster and the image stabilization makes a big difference in sharpness at least for me. The few times that I have gone back and tried to use my old &quot;toy lens&quot; it seems that the lens is jerking around all over the place as I attempt to frame the image: I am unable to hold the lens as steady as I used to even when tracking moving subjects.  I will admit that I have been doing so much flight photography here on Midway that at time my left wrist does hurt!  For folks with a steady hand and a smaller budget the 400 f/5.6L lens can be a great flight lens.   On the second Midway trip well more than half of the group has both the 400 DO and the 70-200 f/4 L  IS and we are all using them ALOT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that the 400 DO is far superior to the older 400 f/5.6 for handheld flight photography for two very obvious reasons:  it is a stop faster and the image stabilization makes a big difference in sharpness at least for me. The few times that I have gone back and tried to use my old &#8220;toy lens&#8221; it seems that the lens is jerking around all over the place as I attempt to frame the image: I am unable to hold the lens as steady as I used to even when tracking moving subjects.  I will admit that I have been doing so much flight photography here on Midway that at time my left wrist does hurt!  For folks with a steady hand and a smaller budget the 400 f/5.6L lens can be a great flight lens.   On the second Midway trip well more than half of the group has both the 400 DO and the 70-200 f/4 L  IS and we are all using them ALOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliotte Rusty Harold</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliotte Rusty Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1078</guid>
		<description>Arthur, I notice that these days you seem to be using the 400mm f/4 IS DO lens as your goto lens for handheld and flight photography. Aside from price, how do you think it compares to the 400mm f/5.6L for similar use? Why do you now choose this one instead of that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur, I notice that these days you seem to be using the 400mm f/4 IS DO lens as your goto lens for handheld and flight photography. Aside from price, how do you think it compares to the 400mm f/5.6L for similar use? Why do you now choose this one instead of that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdsasart</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1077</link>
		<dc:creator>birdsasart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1077</guid>
		<description>Thanks Markus,  I agree.  Good luck with your songbird set-ups!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Markus,  I agree.  Good luck with your songbird set-ups!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdsasart</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1076</link>
		<dc:creator>birdsasart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1076</guid>
		<description>Hi Geurt, Just a brain typo; should have been the 400mm f/4 IS DO.   And thanks for your kind words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Geurt, Just a brain typo; should have been the 400mm f/4 IS DO.   And thanks for your kind words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geurt Bloem</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1075</link>
		<dc:creator>Geurt Bloem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1075</guid>
		<description>Artie,
In the BAA #319, the technical data for image of the barred Owl mentioned a Canon 840 f4 DO. Is this a typing error or is it possible that Canon has a new lens that you test?

Thank also for your absolute unselfish sharing of bird photography information. I am a staunch &quot;Artie&quot; follower.

Cheers
Geurt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artie,<br />
In the BAA #319, the technical data for image of the barred Owl mentioned a Canon 840 f4 DO. Is this a typing error or is it possible that Canon has a new lens that you test?</p>
<p>Thank also for your absolute unselfish sharing of bird photography information. I am a staunch &#8220;Artie&#8221; follower.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Geurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Jais</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Jais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Artie!

BTW: I just finished Alan&#039;s e-book on Songbird Photography. This is just so good!!!!!
I don&#039;t know of anything similar or even remotely as good as Alan&#039;s e-book.

I will try a lot of his stuff during spring and summer!

Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Artie!</p>
<p>BTW: I just finished Alan&#8217;s e-book on Songbird Photography. This is just so good!!!!!<br />
I don&#8217;t know of anything similar or even remotely as good as Alan&#8217;s e-book.</p>
<p>I will try a lot of his stuff during spring and summer!</p>
<p>Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdsasart</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1073</link>
		<dc:creator>birdsasart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:43:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1073</guid>
		<description>Thanks Markus,  Both were with the central sensor only.   With the 7D, I like the center point with the ellipses around it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Markus,  Both were with the central sensor only.   With the 7D, I like the center point with the ellipses around it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: birdsasart</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1072</link>
		<dc:creator>birdsasart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1072</guid>
		<description>Even stranger, they lay a single egg on a bare branch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even stranger, they lay a single egg on a bare branch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Jais</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1071</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Jais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 08:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1071</guid>
		<description>Those are three beautiful shot. I especially like the two flight shots. It is amazing how long and narrow the wings of the albatrosses are.
In the 2nd shot I like the visible ocean and beach.

Did you use the central AF sensor only for this shot or more?
I am currently testing the AF of the 7D with either the central sensor alone, the central sensor with the surrounding 4 sensors or the Zone AF with the central 9 sensors and found that all deliver a good rate of keepers.

Markus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are three beautiful shot. I especially like the two flight shots. It is amazing how long and narrow the wings of the albatrosses are.<br />
In the 2nd shot I like the visible ocean and beach.</p>
<p>Did you use the central AF sensor only for this shot or more?<br />
I am currently testing the AF of the 7D with either the central sensor alone, the central sensor with the surrounding 4 sensors or the Zone AF with the central 9 sensors and found that all deliver a good rate of keepers.</p>
<p>Markus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gayle Clement</title>
		<link>http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1070</link>
		<dc:creator>Gayle Clement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 20:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1070</guid>
		<description>The white terns are such beautiful birds.  I would have expected to see these on a beach.  The perch makes them look even more exotic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The white terns are such beautiful birds.  I would have expected to see these on a beach.  The perch makes them look even more exotic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

