<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS II Gear Questions from the Non-believers :)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2011/03/11/canon-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-gear-questions-from-the-non-believers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/03/11/canon-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-gear-questions-from-the-non-believers/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:16:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/03/11/canon-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-gear-questions-from-the-non-believers/comment-page-1/#comment-141638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 17:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=4487#comment-141638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Art
Just a follow up on our previous conversation regarding the 70-200 II and a 1.4x extender.  I rented the lens and extender and I am glad that I did.  The results I obtained were far less than dazzling and in fact, I was really disappointed.  I had great difficulty obtaining a sharp, clear image.  Then I tried the lens on a friend&#039;s camera (60D) and the results were quite good.  I was really surprised but glad that I only rented this lens for a short time.  I am thinking that instead of a lens, I need to consider a new camera.  (perhaps the 7D)  My 50D is one of the first when they came out and over the past year I have had image issues despite the microadjustment.  Thanks for all the comments and suggestions.  And I am assuming that you have a link to B&#038;H on your web site.

Tom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art<br />
Just a follow up on our previous conversation regarding the 70-200 II and a 1.4x extender.  I rented the lens and extender and I am glad that I did.  The results I obtained were far less than dazzling and in fact, I was really disappointed.  I had great difficulty obtaining a sharp, clear image.  Then I tried the lens on a friend&#8217;s camera (60D) and the results were quite good.  I was really surprised but glad that I only rented this lens for a short time.  I am thinking that instead of a lens, I need to consider a new camera.  (perhaps the 7D)  My 50D is one of the first when they came out and over the past year I have had image issues despite the microadjustment.  Thanks for all the comments and suggestions.  And I am assuming that you have a link to B&amp;H on your web site.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Canon 300 F/2.8L IS II &#38; 400 F/2.8L IS II Availability		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/03/11/canon-70-200-f2-8l-is-ii-gear-questions-from-the-non-believers/comment-page-1/#comment-113224</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Canon 300 F/2.8L IS II &#38; 400 F/2.8L IS II Availability]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=4487#comment-113224</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] and cool box that when opened, you would in an instant identify if it has been tampered with. &#160; If you are after either a Canon 300 f/2.8L IS II or 400 f/2.8 L IS II the good news is that B&#038;... f/2.8 L IS II the good news is that B&#038;H Photo announced they had some stock. However because of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and cool box that when opened, you would in an instant identify if it has been tampered with. &nbsp; If you are after either a Canon 300 f/2.8L IS II or 400 f/2.8 L IS II the good news is that B&amp;&#8230; f/2.8 L IS II the good news is that B&amp;H Photo announced they had some stock. However because of [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
