<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The EF Canon 140-400mm f/5.6 L IS II/III Lens	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2011/11/25/the-ef-canon-140-400mm-f5-6-l-is-iiiii-lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/11/25/the-ef-canon-140-400mm-f5-6-l-is-iiiii-lens/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:10:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Task		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/11/25/the-ef-canon-140-400mm-f5-6-l-is-iiiii-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-153734</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Task]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 07:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=7636#comment-153734</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The new 70-200 IS is the best yet and with the new 2XIII combo offers a 400 mm f5.6 capacity but I believe it falls short in regards to resolution (and certainly in focusing ability) on the the 7D (or any 1.6 X chip).
I have both lenses and have not tried the combo but here is an opinion that should be useful: http://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=en&#038;article=36

It may be that the 1.6 crop cameras are best relegated to only the 1.4X TC&#039;s as auto focusing is considerably slowed down, even if the base lens is a fast one, when using the 2X TC&#039;s.

If any lens needs updating it is the venerable 100-400 which is outstanding in terms of portability and focusing (as opposed to primes and TC&#039;s). It is often loved or hated but often tolerated because it fills a gap that is absent competition save for price and considerable added weight. Have been looking for an update or a combination that would eliminate this lens but so far Canon has not come to the rescue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new 70-200 IS is the best yet and with the new 2XIII combo offers a 400 mm f5.6 capacity but I believe it falls short in regards to resolution (and certainly in focusing ability) on the the 7D (or any 1.6 X chip).<br />
I have both lenses and have not tried the combo but here is an opinion that should be useful: <a href="http://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=en&#038;article=36" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=en&#038;article=36</a></p>
<p>It may be that the 1.6 crop cameras are best relegated to only the 1.4X TC&#8217;s as auto focusing is considerably slowed down, even if the base lens is a fast one, when using the 2X TC&#8217;s.</p>
<p>If any lens needs updating it is the venerable 100-400 which is outstanding in terms of portability and focusing (as opposed to primes and TC&#8217;s). It is often loved or hated but often tolerated because it fills a gap that is absent competition save for price and considerable added weight. Have been looking for an update or a combination that would eliminate this lens but so far Canon has not come to the rescue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/11/25/the-ef-canon-140-400mm-f5-6-l-is-iiiii-lens/comment-page-1/#comment-134172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 03:17:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=7636#comment-134172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;font id=comreply&gt;I like them all :).  My least favorite is the last one; I included it because NIK Color Efex Pro&#039;s detail Extractor improved it so vastly.  &lt;font&gt;artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font id=comreply>I like them all :).  My least favorite is the last one; I included it because NIK Color Efex Pro&#8217;s detail Extractor improved it so vastly.  </font><font>artie</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
