<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My Comments on: For Your Critique/Image #7	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/2011/12/27/my-comments-on-for-your-critiqueimage-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/12/27/my-comments-on-for-your-critiqueimage-7/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 13:53:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: cheapo		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/12/27/my-comments-on-for-your-critiqueimage-7/comment-page-1/#comment-158857</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cheapo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 07:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=8186#comment-158857</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I still can&#039;t help but like it. On second viewing it&#039;s even better. And yes, the appearance of the near primaries is deceptive, but zoomed in it&#039;s easy to spot the curvature of the feather tips, and on four of them we are actually seeing the back of the feather.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still can&#8217;t help but like it. On second viewing it&#8217;s even better. And yes, the appearance of the near primaries is deceptive, but zoomed in it&#8217;s easy to spot the curvature of the feather tips, and on four of them we are actually seeing the back of the feather.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan G. Nelson		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/12/27/my-comments-on-for-your-critiqueimage-7/comment-page-1/#comment-158370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan G. Nelson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 03:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=8186#comment-158370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it very difficult to believe the wing feathers on the near side of the birds wing were not clipped. As you look at the acute angle of the feathers on the near wing they do not relate to the rounded feathers on the other wing and believe this is an escaped bird but nicely photograph especially the detail in the white feathers.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;Hi Alan,  Believe it.  If you look closely, you can see that the near primary tips are simply curled towards us.  The bird is a free and wild, un-pinioned bird (though it is an introduced species).  &lt;font&gt;artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it very difficult to believe the wing feathers on the near side of the birds wing were not clipped. As you look at the acute angle of the feathers on the near wing they do not relate to the rounded feathers on the other wing and believe this is an escaped bird but nicely photograph especially the detail in the white feathers.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>Hi Alan,  Believe it.  If you look closely, you can see that the near primary tips are simply curled towards us.  The bird is a free and wild, un-pinioned bird (though it is an introduced species).  </font><font>artie</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
