Comments on: Photoshop Lesson Continued: A Jim Howell Question https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/04/photoshop-lesson-continued-a-jim-howell-question/ The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:44:15 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: John Curd https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/04/photoshop-lesson-continued-a-jim-howell-question/comment-page-1/#comment-25583 Thu, 11 Nov 2010 09:58:49 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3092#comment-25583 Art, based upon your very first response, I must admit to having grabbed the wrong end of the stick, initially. I had thought that not all three birds were present at the same time. I see now that my conclusion was incorrect. With my sense of reality thus adjusted, your shot is no different from photostiching a panorama – it’s just a wildlife panorama. Granted, minor details may have changed between shots (a turn of the head, an expression – assuming such birds have expressions) but so do certain details in landscape panoramas – wildlife moves, clouds move, flags flutter, etc.

Now, where’s that Fuji GX617? Actually, I’d be satisfied with an EOS 7D at the moment. 🙂

]]> By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/04/photoshop-lesson-continued-a-jim-howell-question/comment-page-1/#comment-24888 Tue, 09 Nov 2010 02:43:59 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3092#comment-24888 I am fine with you thinking that it is not a photograph.

Definition of INSIDIOUS

1
a : awaiting a chance to entrap : treacherous
b : harmful but enticing : seductive
2
a : having a gradual and cumulative effect : subtle

]]>