<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Back to the Basics and More #3/Galapagos	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2009/07/28/back-to-the-basics-and-more-3galapagos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2009/07/28/back-to-the-basics-and-more-3galapagos/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Markus Jais		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2009/07/28/back-to-the-basics-and-more-3galapagos/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Markus Jais]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=596#comment-292</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your help with BPN. Everything is working again.

You are of course right with JI = JO. I think LR2 or PS can fix certain problems but if the image is garbage, no software can change this.

I remember meeting a guy in Spain who did a lot of flight shots of vultures like I did. We both got a lot of unsharp pictures (probably because I was using wrong technique, still learning here).
The other guy sad it doesn&#039;t matter, he can always sharpen the images with PS.  I told him that he will be in for a really bad surprise. He didn&#039;t believe it.
Too many people today think that proper technique is no longer important and believe that software can cure even the worst images.

I prefer your way and try to get the best possible image in camera.
And then do only some fine tuning with software. Shooting is more fun than PS, anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your help with BPN. Everything is working again.</p>
<p>You are of course right with JI = JO. I think LR2 or PS can fix certain problems but if the image is garbage, no software can change this.</p>
<p>I remember meeting a guy in Spain who did a lot of flight shots of vultures like I did. We both got a lot of unsharp pictures (probably because I was using wrong technique, still learning here).<br />
The other guy sad it doesn&#8217;t matter, he can always sharpen the images with PS.  I told him that he will be in for a really bad surprise. He didn&#8217;t believe it.<br />
Too many people today think that proper technique is no longer important and believe that software can cure even the worst images.</p>
<p>I prefer your way and try to get the best possible image in camera.<br />
And then do only some fine tuning with software. Shooting is more fun than PS, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: birdsasart		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2009/07/28/back-to-the-basics-and-more-3galapagos/comment-page-1/#comment-291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[birdsasart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=596#comment-291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2009/07/28/back-to-the-basics-and-more-3galapagos/comment-page-1/#comment-290&quot;&gt;Markus Jais&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks markus.  Don&#039;t get me wrong.  JI = JO.  Junk in equals junk out.  You cannot make a bad image into a good image.  I&#039;ve been trying to get a free copy of Lightroom for some time now....  As far as I can tell, my images do not look half bad and it is hard to teach an old dog new tricks.

BTW, I have spoken to James about the BPN membership problem; you should hear from him very soon. Thanks for your patience.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2009/07/28/back-to-the-basics-and-more-3galapagos/comment-page-1/#comment-290">Markus Jais</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks markus.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong.  JI = JO.  Junk in equals junk out.  You cannot make a bad image into a good image.  I&#8217;ve been trying to get a free copy of Lightroom for some time now&#8230;.  As far as I can tell, my images do not look half bad and it is hard to teach an old dog new tricks.</p>
<p>BTW, I have spoken to James about the BPN membership problem; you should hear from him very soon. Thanks for your patience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
