<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: More Midway!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/03/08/more-midway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/03/08/more-midway/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: birdsasart		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[birdsasart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 15:58:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1078&quot;&gt;Elliotte Rusty Harold&lt;/a&gt;.

I feel that the 400 DO is far superior to the older 400 f/5.6 for handheld flight photography for two very obvious reasons:  it is a stop faster and the image stabilization makes a big difference in sharpness at least for me. The few times that I have gone back and tried to use my old &quot;toy lens&quot; it seems that the lens is jerking around all over the place as I attempt to frame the image: I am unable to hold the lens as steady as I used to even when tracking moving subjects.  I will admit that I have been doing so much flight photography here on Midway that at time my left wrist does hurt!  For folks with a steady hand and a smaller budget the 400 f/5.6L lens can be a great flight lens.   On the second Midway trip well more than half of the group has both the 400 DO and the 70-200 f/4 L  IS and we are all using them ALOT!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1078">Elliotte Rusty Harold</a>.</p>
<p>I feel that the 400 DO is far superior to the older 400 f/5.6 for handheld flight photography for two very obvious reasons:  it is a stop faster and the image stabilization makes a big difference in sharpness at least for me. The few times that I have gone back and tried to use my old &#8220;toy lens&#8221; it seems that the lens is jerking around all over the place as I attempt to frame the image: I am unable to hold the lens as steady as I used to even when tracking moving subjects.  I will admit that I have been doing so much flight photography here on Midway that at time my left wrist does hurt!  For folks with a steady hand and a smaller budget the 400 f/5.6L lens can be a great flight lens.   On the second Midway trip well more than half of the group has both the 400 DO and the 70-200 f/4 L  IS and we are all using them ALOT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Elliotte Rusty Harold		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/03/08/more-midway/comment-page-1/#comment-1078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elliotte Rusty Harold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 13:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=1007#comment-1078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Arthur, I notice that these days you seem to be using the 400mm f/4 IS DO lens as your goto lens for handheld and flight photography. Aside from price, how do you think it compares to the 400mm f/5.6L for similar use? Why do you now choose this one instead of that one?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur, I notice that these days you seem to be using the 400mm f/4 IS DO lens as your goto lens for handheld and flight photography. Aside from price, how do you think it compares to the 400mm f/5.6L for similar use? Why do you now choose this one instead of that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
