<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Which Do You Prefer: Soft or Sharp?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/23/which-do-you-prefer-soft-or-sharp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/23/which-do-you-prefer-soft-or-sharp/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/23/which-do-you-prefer-soft-or-sharp/comment-page-1/#comment-47856</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3195#comment-47856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like them both..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like them both..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rollin E. Drew		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/11/23/which-do-you-prefer-soft-or-sharp/comment-page-1/#comment-29091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rollin E. Drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 14:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3195#comment-29091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If the blurred image of the Sandhill Cranes was 4&#039;X 6&#039; hanging in MOMA I think it would receive favorable attention, by me at least.  However, as a photograph of Sandhill Cranes, I think it fails. Candidly, the image of the American Wigeon seems to fail either as a sharp photographic study of a landing American Wigeon or a surrealistic blurred photographic image, though I assume the former was intended as a contrast to the Sandhill Cranes image.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the blurred image of the Sandhill Cranes was 4&#8217;X 6&#8242; hanging in MOMA I think it would receive favorable attention, by me at least.  However, as a photograph of Sandhill Cranes, I think it fails. Candidly, the image of the American Wigeon seems to fail either as a sharp photographic study of a landing American Wigeon or a surrealistic blurred photographic image, though I assume the former was intended as a contrast to the Sandhill Cranes image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
