<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Which Image Do You Like Best, and Why?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/03/which-image-do-you-like-best-and-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/03/which-image-do-you-like-best-and-why/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2011 19:18:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Esther Corley		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/03/which-image-do-you-like-best-and-why/comment-page-1/#comment-34435</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Esther Corley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3265#comment-34435</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[#2, by all means. #3 is very confusing to me. Nothing of importance shows. #1 does not have action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#2, by all means. #3 is very confusing to me. Nothing of importance shows. #1 does not have action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Figgis		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/03/which-image-do-you-like-best-and-why/comment-page-1/#comment-31646</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Figgis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 21:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3265#comment-31646</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m fascinated by the diversity of comments and perspectives here. In response to Melvin Grey, who writes: &quot;The intent is usually to get a good descriptive image of the species showing its identification characteristics clearly&quot; -- I think this points to differences some of us have with respect to what constitutes a good wildlife photo. From a birder&#039;s perspective,  the comment is quite true. But I like shooting both, looking for the esoteric and aesthetic to render even the most common, artistic and unusual. That&#039;s why I do like #3.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m fascinated by the diversity of comments and perspectives here. In response to Melvin Grey, who writes: &#8220;The intent is usually to get a good descriptive image of the species showing its identification characteristics clearly&#8221; &#8212; I think this points to differences some of us have with respect to what constitutes a good wildlife photo. From a birder&#8217;s perspective,  the comment is quite true. But I like shooting both, looking for the esoteric and aesthetic to render even the most common, artistic and unusual. That&#8217;s why I do like #3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
