<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Assorted Comments	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/19/assorted-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/19/assorted-comments/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/19/assorted-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-50064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 12:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3401#comment-50064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bill,  Getting low would have resulted in a much more beautiful, intimate image.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,  Getting low would have resulted in a much more beautiful, intimate image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Tyler		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2010/12/19/assorted-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-36150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Tyler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=3401#comment-36150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Arthur,

You write, &quot;As for a lower angle, I was using the BLUBB in my vehicle with the window rolled all the way down so I could not get any lower.&quot; You&#039;ve explained why the lower viewpoint was unavailable, but not whether you agree or disagree that it would have improved the image. Of course, since life is unfair, a lower viewpoint would likely have obscured even more of the feet. 

Bill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur,</p>
<p>You write, &#8220;As for a lower angle, I was using the BLUBB in my vehicle with the window rolled all the way down so I could not get any lower.&#8221; You&#8217;ve explained why the lower viewpoint was unavailable, but not whether you agree or disagree that it would have improved the image. Of course, since life is unfair, a lower viewpoint would likely have obscured even more of the feet. </p>
<p>Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
