<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Will the EF 800mm f/5.6L Soon Become Obsolete?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/04/06/will-the-ef-800mm-f5-6l-soon-become-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/04/06/will-the-ef-800mm-f5-6l-soon-become-obsolete/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:11:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/04/06/will-the-ef-800mm-f5-6l-soon-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-226068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quazi Ahmed Hussain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=4947#comment-226068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Arthur, how are you?

I&#039;ve read your concerns re the new flagship Canon EOS 1Dx.  Probably it&#039;s better to continue with 1DIV and other enthusiast crop bodies for a while.

What&#039;s your opinion?

Regards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arthur, how are you?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read your concerns re the new flagship Canon EOS 1Dx.  Probably it&#8217;s better to continue with 1DIV and other enthusiast crop bodies for a while.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s your opinion?</p>
<p>Regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2011/04/06/will-the-ef-800mm-f5-6l-soon-become-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-71356</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quazi Ahmed Hussain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 04:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=4947#comment-71356</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Arthur,

You are a renowned photographer and I do not dare entering into argument with you.  Your are vastly superior when it comes to bird photography undoubtedly.  However, my point is probably missed here.  What I want to say is; photographers should be free to make their own choices.  IS technology is not very old.  Even few years ago you made wonderful images with film cameras fitted with non-IS lenses.  Even a layman like me produced around 32 good images out of 38 shots available on the film.

Canon still makes some non-IS lenses and all of those sell well.  Therefore, IS is certainly an advantage however, it is not something that photographers cannot do without.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Arthur,</p>
<p>You are a renowned photographer and I do not dare entering into argument with you.  Your are vastly superior when it comes to bird photography undoubtedly.  However, my point is probably missed here.  What I want to say is; photographers should be free to make their own choices.  IS technology is not very old.  Even few years ago you made wonderful images with film cameras fitted with non-IS lenses.  Even a layman like me produced around 32 good images out of 38 shots available on the film.</p>
<p>Canon still makes some non-IS lenses and all of those sell well.  Therefore, IS is certainly an advantage however, it is not something that photographers cannot do without.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
