<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Image Stabilization Settings: A Whole New World	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/07/13/image-stabilization-settings-a-whole-new-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/07/13/image-stabilization-settings-a-whole-new-world/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:51:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/07/13/image-stabilization-settings-a-whole-new-world/comment-page-1/#comment-254913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=10710#comment-254913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;font id=comreply&gt; While several folks gave correct answers, with Greg Payne&#039;s the best of those, the lesson that everyone needs to remember is this:  

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;Depth of field decreases as the subject to imaging sensor distance decreases.  So, when you are working at close range with a long lens, near minimum focusing distance, depth of field is at a minimum and is usually measured in tiny fractions of an inch. So when you are close to a small bird or creating tight head portraits it is generally best to stop down considerably. &lt;font&gt; 

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;The corollary is that depth of field is far less of a concern with when working with relatively distant subjects.    &lt;font&gt; artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font id=comreply> While several folks gave correct answers, with Greg Payne&#8217;s the best of those, the lesson that everyone needs to remember is this:  </p>
<p></font><font id=comreply>Depth of field decreases as the subject to imaging sensor distance decreases.  So, when you are working at close range with a long lens, near minimum focusing distance, depth of field is at a minimum and is usually measured in tiny fractions of an inch. So when you are close to a small bird or creating tight head portraits it is generally best to stop down considerably. </font><font> </p>
<p></font><font id=comreply>The corollary is that depth of field is far less of a concern with when working with relatively distant subjects.    </font><font> artie</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/07/13/image-stabilization-settings-a-whole-new-world/comment-page-1/#comment-254907</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=10710#comment-254907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/07/13/image-stabilization-settings-a-whole-new-world/comment-page-1/#comment-254674&quot;&gt;Mark A Jordan&lt;/a&gt;.

Sorry, that has nothing to do with it :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/07/13/image-stabilization-settings-a-whole-new-world/comment-page-1/#comment-254674">Mark A Jordan</a>.</p>
<p>Sorry, that has nothing to do with it 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
