<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Lens Align Mk II &#038; the Non-tethered Micro-adjusting Tutorial	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/10/10/the-lens-align-mk-ii-the-non-tethered-micro-adjusting-tutorial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/10/10/the-lens-align-mk-ii-the-non-tethered-micro-adjusting-tutorial/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/10/10/the-lens-align-mk-ii-the-non-tethered-micro-adjusting-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-561373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 10:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=12091#comment-561373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/10/10/the-lens-align-mk-ii-the-non-tethered-micro-adjusting-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-560795&quot;&gt;Lou Dina&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Lou,   I am sure that the answer is yes but am surprised by such dramatic differences.  I will alert Micheal Tapes to your question in hopes that he can respond here. best, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/10/10/the-lens-align-mk-ii-the-non-tethered-micro-adjusting-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-560795">Lou Dina</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Lou,   I am sure that the answer is yes but am surprised by such dramatic differences.  I will alert Micheal Tapes to your question in hopes that he can respond here. best, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lou Dina		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2012/10/10/the-lens-align-mk-ii-the-non-tethered-micro-adjusting-tutorial/comment-page-1/#comment-560795</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lou Dina]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=12091#comment-560795</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the great article. Have you noticed any difference calibrating a camera under different light sources, specifically comparing incandescent and daylight? Perhaps not since birding involves long lenses for outdoor use. But, I am finding that my lenses focus differently when calibrated under two light sources. So far, I am finding that under daylight conditions, the micro adjustment for my Canon 5Dmk2 needs to move between 6 and 9 points in the negative direction (compared to tungsten calibration). 

Anybody else seeing this or understand it? I guess it could be my testing, but I am being very careful, using both a LensAlign mk2 and FocusTune 2.0 software. So far, I have tested three different Canon lenses with similar results: 85/f1.8, 100/f2.8 macro, 25-105/f4L.

If this is true, I have an interesting dilemma, because I do a lot of outdoor and studio portrait photography. In the studio, I use tungsten modeling lights and strobes.  Interested to see if anybody knows more on this subject. Not sure where to set my AF microadjustment with the current differences between daylight and tungsten.

Lou Dina]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great article. Have you noticed any difference calibrating a camera under different light sources, specifically comparing incandescent and daylight? Perhaps not since birding involves long lenses for outdoor use. But, I am finding that my lenses focus differently when calibrated under two light sources. So far, I am finding that under daylight conditions, the micro adjustment for my Canon 5Dmk2 needs to move between 6 and 9 points in the negative direction (compared to tungsten calibration). </p>
<p>Anybody else seeing this or understand it? I guess it could be my testing, but I am being very careful, using both a LensAlign mk2 and FocusTune 2.0 software. So far, I have tested three different Canon lenses with similar results: 85/f1.8, 100/f2.8 macro, 25-105/f4L.</p>
<p>If this is true, I have an interesting dilemma, because I do a lot of outdoor and studio portrait photography. In the studio, I use tungsten modeling lights and strobes.  Interested to see if anybody knows more on this subject. Not sure where to set my AF microadjustment with the current differences between daylight and tungsten.</p>
<p>Lou Dina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
