<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: John Shaw on Exposure/A Guest Blog Post	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:34:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick Clayton		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-450765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick Clayton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=13475#comment-450765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-450753&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the prompt reply Artie, whatever you are doing certainly seems to be working for you :)

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;YAW and I agree.  I often say, &quot;It&#039;s not like my images suck :)&quot;  &lt;font&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-450753">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the prompt reply Artie, whatever you are doing certainly seems to be working for you 🙂</p>
<p><font id=comreply>YAW and I agree.  I often say, &#8220;It&#8217;s not like my images suck :)&#8221;  </font><font></font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-450753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 11:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=13475#comment-450753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-450744&quot;&gt;Nick Clayton&lt;/a&gt;.

Theoretically yes.  And as far as I understand things, that is what John is suggesting.  But practically, no. I like my WHITEs coming into DPP at no more than 235-240 so that I do not have to struggle to bring out the detail during the image optimization process. Try it both ways and decide what is best for you. 

And heck, I am here sticking my neck out so no problema.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/02/03/john-shaw-on-exposurea-guest-blog-post/comment-page-1/#comment-450744">Nick Clayton</a>.</p>
<p>Theoretically yes.  And as far as I understand things, that is what John is suggesting.  But practically, no. I like my WHITEs coming into DPP at no more than 235-240 so that I do not have to struggle to bring out the detail during the image optimization process. Try it both ways and decide what is best for you. </p>
<p>And heck, I am here sticking my neck out so no problema.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
