<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Like the Rear End or Not?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/03/24/like-the-rear-end-or-not-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/03/24/like-the-rear-end-or-not-2/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Charles Scheffold		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/03/24/like-the-rear-end-or-not-2/comment-page-1/#comment-473039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Scheffold]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 18:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14137#comment-473039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[After thinking about this for a while, I definitely prefer the version with the blurred adult rear end. The sharp one distracts me from the juvenile. I think the blurred one adds interest without pulling my eye away from the main subject - a cute, fluffy, baby crane.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After thinking about this for a while, I definitely prefer the version with the blurred adult rear end. The sharp one distracts me from the juvenile. I think the blurred one adds interest without pulling my eye away from the main subject &#8211; a cute, fluffy, baby crane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Richardson		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/03/24/like-the-rear-end-or-not-2/comment-page-1/#comment-473000</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Richardson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 16:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14137#comment-473000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/03/24/like-the-rear-end-or-not-2/comment-page-1/#comment-472948&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

I never use the ring of ire in the 1D4 because it is too slow to acquire focus.  The 5D3 seems a bit faster but I have not purchased a 1Dx to try for myself.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;There are times when ring of fire is clearly best.  I believe that they are detailed in the &lt;a href=&quot;https://store.birdsasart.com/shop/item.aspx?itemid=286&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MIV User&#039;s Guide&lt;/a&gt;.  Another trick with that camera and ring of fire is to acquire focus on the edge of the array (despite what Canon advises....)   &lt;font&gt; artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/03/24/like-the-rear-end-or-not-2/comment-page-1/#comment-472948">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>I never use the ring of ire in the 1D4 because it is too slow to acquire focus.  The 5D3 seems a bit faster but I have not purchased a 1Dx to try for myself.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>There are times when ring of fire is clearly best.  I believe that they are detailed in the <a href="https://store.birdsasart.com/shop/item.aspx?itemid=286" rel="nofollow">MIV User&#8217;s Guide</a>.  Another trick with that camera and ring of fire is to acquire focus on the edge of the array (despite what Canon advises&#8230;.)   </font><font> artie</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
