<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Variety&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/07/variety-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/07/variety-2/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:02:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Neil Hickman		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/07/variety-2/comment-page-1/#comment-516784</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Hickman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14542#comment-516784</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Number 3. Two steps to the right and two steps forward may have removed those bare patches which some don&#039;t like and also kept the composition.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3. Two steps to the right and two steps forward may have removed those bare patches which some don&#8217;t like and also kept the composition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Rista		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/07/variety-2/comment-page-1/#comment-513886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Rista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14542#comment-513886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think Image C definitely has strength...but it kind of peters out at the bottom and right hand edges where the flowers also peter out. If the rows of flowers had been complete, I think without question Image C would have been the most impactful. It&#039;s a contest between A and B...and I think B, for me, wins out with a bit more balance between the sky and the flowery foreground. I like the greater amount of blue sky and punchier colors in A, but the flowers take up so little of the frame...

Anyway, interesting to see all the tulips closed up like that. I grow tulips in my yard, and while the majority of them have blooms on them, because of the continuing very cold weather here in Colorado (which, as luck would have it, finally seems to have ended today!), they are closed up into colorful little pointed gems like the ones in your photo. I hope to see my flowers in full bloom before their time runs out...first year when all of them have bloomed (only first started planting the bulbs a couple years ago.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Image C definitely has strength&#8230;but it kind of peters out at the bottom and right hand edges where the flowers also peter out. If the rows of flowers had been complete, I think without question Image C would have been the most impactful. It&#8217;s a contest between A and B&#8230;and I think B, for me, wins out with a bit more balance between the sky and the flowery foreground. I like the greater amount of blue sky and punchier colors in A, but the flowers take up so little of the frame&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway, interesting to see all the tulips closed up like that. I grow tulips in my yard, and while the majority of them have blooms on them, because of the continuing very cold weather here in Colorado (which, as luck would have it, finally seems to have ended today!), they are closed up into colorful little pointed gems like the ones in your photo. I hope to see my flowers in full bloom before their time runs out&#8230;first year when all of them have bloomed (only first started planting the bulbs a couple years ago.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
