<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Not Just For Potato Chips	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/09/not-just-for-potato-chips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/09/not-just-for-potato-chips/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:37:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon Rista		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/09/not-just-for-potato-chips/comment-page-1/#comment-513881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon Rista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 03:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14566#comment-513881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like both photos. Both are beautiful as always. I think I like the first one a little better...the OOF bird is a little distracting, but I think much less so than the OOF bird in the second photo. It really seems to compete for attention as its more defined, more recognizable as a bird, than in the first photo. 

I do like the foreground/beach and background in the second photo a little more...if it wasn&#039;t for the OOF bird, I think it would make for a more flattering photo overall, as the lighter surroundings seem to help bring out the bird a little more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like both photos. Both are beautiful as always. I think I like the first one a little better&#8230;the OOF bird is a little distracting, but I think much less so than the OOF bird in the second photo. It really seems to compete for attention as its more defined, more recognizable as a bird, than in the first photo. </p>
<p>I do like the foreground/beach and background in the second photo a little more&#8230;if it wasn&#8217;t for the OOF bird, I think it would make for a more flattering photo overall, as the lighter surroundings seem to help bring out the bird a little more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/09/not-just-for-potato-chips/comment-page-1/#comment-512867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 21:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14566#comment-512867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A sentence is as sentence whatever side of the pond, but at least you are good at writing run-on sentences. And do post a link to your blog so that folks can see your images. You&#039;ve never said a word here but decide to show up and tell the world that both of the images I posted suck.  You want to see poor manners and a total lack of respect, look in the mirror.  It seems pretty obvious that you don&#039;t know anything about what makes a good image.  As I wrote in today&#039;s blog post, what the heck do I know? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sentence is as sentence whatever side of the pond, but at least you are good at writing run-on sentences. And do post a link to your blog so that folks can see your images. You&#8217;ve never said a word here but decide to show up and tell the world that both of the images I posted suck.  You want to see poor manners and a total lack of respect, look in the mirror.  It seems pretty obvious that you don&#8217;t know anything about what makes a good image.  As I wrote in today&#8217;s blog post, what the heck do I know? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
