<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Your Call and More	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/22/your-call-and-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/22/your-call-and-more/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris K.		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/22/your-call-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-522132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris K.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14718#comment-522132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Art, need to ask a question, I tried DPP with my 5D III and on the same RAW image then tried Lightroom 5 beta and why does the DPP look better? I mean in lightroom when I saved to TIFF and TIFF in DPP the lightroom image had more noise and DPP was cleaner, and that is with no noise reduction on both, also color was better in DPP, can&#039;t understand that.
Thanks
Chris;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Art, need to ask a question, I tried DPP with my 5D III and on the same RAW image then tried Lightroom 5 beta and why does the DPP look better? I mean in lightroom when I saved to TIFF and TIFF in DPP the lightroom image had more noise and DPP was cleaner, and that is with no noise reduction on both, also color was better in DPP, can&#8217;t understand that.<br />
Thanks<br />
Chris;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/22/your-call-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-521529</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 13:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14718#comment-521529</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/22/your-call-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-521521&quot;&gt;Bill Richardson&lt;/a&gt;.

While I do advise folks to expose to the right I would generally not work this light for several reasons: #1: here doing do yielded a marginal shutter speed.  #2:  I like to bring my WHITEs into DPP (or into ACR when I used to use it) with RGB values no greater than 230-235.  Denise prefers235-240.   Else it is too much work to reveal detail....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/05/22/your-call-and-more/comment-page-1/#comment-521521">Bill Richardson</a>.</p>
<p>While I do advise folks to expose to the right I would generally not work this light for several reasons: #1: here doing do yielded a marginal shutter speed.  #2:  I like to bring my WHITEs into DPP (or into ACR when I used to use it) with RGB values no greater than 230-235.  Denise prefers235-240.   Else it is too much work to reveal detail&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
