Comments on: More Thoughts on the Canon 200-400 f/4L IS and the Series II Super-telephoto Lenses https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/08/more-thoughts-on-the-canon-200-400-f4l-is-and-the-series-ii-super-telephoto-lenses/ The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:32:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8 By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/08/more-thoughts-on-the-canon-200-400-f4l-is-and-the-series-ii-super-telephoto-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-846398 Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:32:04 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14926#comment-846398 In reply to David.

That is one of the easiest no-brainers ever. If you like birds, you need the 600 II. I will send the two links via e-mail later. If you are strong enough to hold it, the 2-4 is better for flight in nearly all cases as it gives you much greater flexibility; being able to zoom out as the bird gets closer is a great benefit. artie

]]> By: David https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/08/more-thoughts-on-the-canon-200-400-f4l-is-and-the-series-ii-super-telephoto-lenses/comment-page-1/#comment-846377 Fri, 07 Mar 2014 19:24:20 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=14926#comment-846377 In reply to Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART.

Thanks for the quick reply Arthur. I did mean to write that I thought the 300 would be better for birds in flight than the 200-400. I appreciate your thoughts on owning both – a very nice luxury. I probably need to decide it I’d rather own the 300 or the 600 to go along with my 200-400. Any thoughts if you could only buy 1 of them?

]]>