<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Down By the Lake With the EF200-400mm f/4L IS/Internal 1.4 Extender: One Huge Surprise!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/16/down-by-the-lake-with-the-ef200-400mm-f4l-isinternal-1-4-extender-one-huge-surprise-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/16/down-by-the-lake-with-the-ef200-400mm-f4l-isinternal-1-4-extender-one-huge-surprise-2/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 13:11:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/16/down-by-the-lake-with-the-ef200-400mm-f4l-isinternal-1-4-extender-one-huge-surprise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-537962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=15021#comment-537962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/16/down-by-the-lake-with-the-ef200-400mm-f4l-isinternal-1-4-extender-one-huge-surprise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-537768&quot;&gt;Dave Klein&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Again Dave, There will always be some degradation, about 14% or so with a 1.4X TC.  But the top of the line lenses are so, so sharp that it is easy to produce professionally sharp images with all three TCs with perfect technique.  I am betting that the new 80-400 is money in the bank.   If you see any bad reviews from the internet experts make sure to ask them if they ever used one....   

I was confused as I thought that you went from the 200-400 to the new 80-400.  My bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/16/down-by-the-lake-with-the-ef200-400mm-f4l-isinternal-1-4-extender-one-huge-surprise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-537768">Dave Klein</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Again Dave, There will always be some degradation, about 14% or so with a 1.4X TC.  But the top of the line lenses are so, so sharp that it is easy to produce professionally sharp images with all three TCs with perfect technique.  I am betting that the new 80-400 is money in the bank.   If you see any bad reviews from the internet experts make sure to ask them if they ever used one&#8230;.   </p>
<p>I was confused as I thought that you went from the 200-400 to the new 80-400.  My bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Klein		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/06/16/down-by-the-lake-with-the-ef200-400mm-f4l-isinternal-1-4-extender-one-huge-surprise-2/comment-page-1/#comment-537768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Klein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=15021#comment-537768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have used both the 1.4X and 1.7X TC&#039;s with very sharp results. I prefer the 1.4X and saw no noticeable degradation in IQ. I also use primarily DX bodies so I would get more reach but have added a D600 to the mix. I think you will find this new Canon version to be one you will bring along quite often. I have been trying get my hands on all legitimate reviews for the Nikon 80-400 to see if it is worth parting with the 200-400. Thanks for the questions and enjoy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used both the 1.4X and 1.7X TC&#8217;s with very sharp results. I prefer the 1.4X and saw no noticeable degradation in IQ. I also use primarily DX bodies so I would get more reach but have added a D600 to the mix. I think you will find this new Canon version to be one you will bring along quite often. I have been trying get my hands on all legitimate reviews for the Nikon 80-400 to see if it is worth parting with the 200-400. Thanks for the questions and enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
