<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Big Bird/See You Soon!	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/09/25/big-birdsee-you-soon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/09/25/big-birdsee-you-soon/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 18:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Lethbridge		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/09/25/big-birdsee-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-618656</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Lethbridge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 18:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16163#comment-618656</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1) I like number one the best, because of the pleasing composition.
2) It would change the balance of the composition.  The picture is divided vertically into
   thirds, the neck and head; the body; and the legs.  Each third is composed roughly    
   one third/two thirds, in what I believe is called the Golden Ratio, laterally.  
   Changing the pointing of the lens would upset this.
3)   I would leave it as it is. The arrow-like green patch leads the eye into the main
   subject, the ostrich.
4) I cannot really see any difference; if I had to choose marginally number one seems
   lees sharp.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) I like number one the best, because of the pleasing composition.<br />
2) It would change the balance of the composition.  The picture is divided vertically into<br />
   thirds, the neck and head; the body; and the legs.  Each third is composed roughly<br />
   one third/two thirds, in what I believe is called the Golden Ratio, laterally.<br />
   Changing the pointing of the lens would upset this.<br />
3)   I would leave it as it is. The arrow-like green patch leads the eye into the main<br />
   subject, the ostrich.<br />
4) I cannot really see any difference; if I had to choose marginally number one seems<br />
   lees sharp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dennis		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/09/25/big-birdsee-you-soon/comment-page-1/#comment-618144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 23:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16163#comment-618144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Art, In answer to your third question about which is focused best in the face, I would say # 2 is the least focused.  1 &#038; 3 look spot on but there is a slight softness in #2.  Still, all wonderful shots.  Are any of these shots cropped at all?  Thanks, Dennis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Art, In answer to your third question about which is focused best in the face, I would say # 2 is the least focused.  1 &amp; 3 look spot on but there is a slight softness in #2.  Still, all wonderful shots.  Are any of these shots cropped at all?  Thanks, Dennis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
