<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Eyes Have It	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/04/the-eyes-have-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/04/the-eyes-have-it/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 00:03:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Curtin		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/04/the-eyes-have-it/comment-page-1/#comment-623296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Curtin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2013 00:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16229#comment-623296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t notice any definite  fishyness but wonder if some blur was used on the background.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t notice any definite  fishyness but wonder if some blur was used on the background.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Roper		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/04/the-eyes-have-it/comment-page-1/#comment-622687</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Roper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2013 03:27:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16229#comment-622687</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only &#039;fishy&#039; thing I notice is the dust spot near the green triangle on the upper right side.

q: why add +1 1/3 exposure compensation?
a: because the sand averages lighter than middle exposure so you need to add light to expose the iguana.

q: why are the eyes sharp if the AF sensor was on the tip of the nose?
a: as subject distance increases so does depth of field]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only &#8216;fishy&#8217; thing I notice is the dust spot near the green triangle on the upper right side.</p>
<p>q: why add +1 1/3 exposure compensation?<br />
a: because the sand averages lighter than middle exposure so you need to add light to expose the iguana.</p>
<p>q: why are the eyes sharp if the AF sensor was on the tip of the nose?<br />
a: as subject distance increases so does depth of field</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
