Comments on: Response to the Blur-Haters https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/15/response-to-the-blur-haters-2/ The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:29:59 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: David Policansky https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/15/response-to-the-blur-haters-2/comment-page-1/#comment-633763 Thu, 17 Oct 2013 16:29:59 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16435#comment-633763 Hi, Artie. I like this image, I think because the bird’s head and the top of its neck–maybe that’s only its head–are parallel to the grasses.

]]> By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/10/15/response-to-the-blur-haters-2/comment-page-1/#comment-633666 Thu, 17 Oct 2013 13:54:42 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16435#comment-633666 In reply to Ron Fullelove.

Thanks for your kind words Ron. It is rare that a good pleasing blur is a mistake. Most are carefully planned and 99.9% of them need to be focused accurately.

My best advice is to get yourself a copy or our “A Guide to Pleasing Blurs.”

]]>