<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Big Lens Choices for Canon and Nikon&#8211;As I See Them&#8230;.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:20:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Policansky		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/comment-page-1/#comment-711338</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Policansky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 22:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16814#comment-711338</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/comment-page-1/#comment-711120&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks, Artie.  No chance for flying birds!  But using live view the camera autofocused well with the 600/2X TC combo (the snowy owl), not with the 400 f/5.6L.  I haven&#039;t mastered the art of manual focusing with live view, it&#039;s never sharp enough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/comment-page-1/#comment-711120">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks, Artie.  No chance for flying birds!  But using live view the camera autofocused well with the 600/2X TC combo (the snowy owl), not with the 400 f/5.6L.  I haven&#8217;t mastered the art of manual focusing with live view, it&#8217;s never sharp enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/comment-page-1/#comment-711120</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2013 19:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16814#comment-711120</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/comment-page-1/#comment-710798&quot;&gt;David Policansky&lt;/a&gt;.

Less than ideal in both cases...   When you focused with Live View did you focus manually.  As for the 7D 400 f/5.6 if you pre-focus manually you should get sharp images but it would be less than ideal for flight of course. 

I occasionally used my 400 f/5.6 with a 1.4 and made some good images.  But that was on film :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/18/big-lens-choices-for-canon-and-nikon-as-i-see-them/comment-page-1/#comment-710798">David Policansky</a>.</p>
<p>Less than ideal in both cases&#8230;   When you focused with Live View did you focus manually.  As for the 7D 400 f/5.6 if you pre-focus manually you should get sharp images but it would be less than ideal for flight of course. </p>
<p>I occasionally used my 400 f/5.6 with a 1.4 and made some good images.  But that was on film 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
