<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Beyond Spectacular Part I	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-688428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 11:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16949#comment-688428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-688072&quot;&gt;Tom Roper&lt;/a&gt;.

Less work cleaning sensor dust is the correct answer.  Well done!  And thanks for doing the aperture math.  artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-688072">Tom Roper</a>.</p>
<p>Less work cleaning sensor dust is the correct answer.  Well done!  And thanks for doing the aperture math.  artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Roper		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-688072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Roper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2013 04:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=16949#comment-688072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-684357&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

I give up on why f/8 is better than f/22.  I went back to your ABP II to read again the section on blurs but most of those were shot at small f stop, around f/29 if I remember correctly.  
My best guess would be at f/8 the DOF is shallower and won&#039;t show certain things(small items, sensor dust, etc.) in the scene that you would see at a higher f stop which you might use to achieve a slow enough shutter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/11/26/beyond-spectacular-part-i/comment-page-1/#comment-684357">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>I give up on why f/8 is better than f/22.  I went back to your ABP II to read again the section on blurs but most of those were shot at small f stop, around f/29 if I remember correctly.<br />
My best guess would be at f/8 the DOF is shallower and won&#8217;t show certain things(small items, sensor dust, etc.) in the scene that you would see at a higher f stop which you might use to achieve a slow enough shutter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
