Comments on: Three Lenses, and the Power of Twelve https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/12/10/three-lenses-and-the-power-of-twelve/ The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:38:37 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/12/10/three-lenses-and-the-power-of-twelve/comment-page-1/#comment-793157 Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:54:29 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=17236#comment-793157 In reply to Doug West.

Hey Doug. You know me too well on #1; good thinking! artie

]]> By: Daniel Sziklai https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2013/12/10/three-lenses-and-the-power-of-twelve/comment-page-1/#comment-705334 Wed, 11 Dec 2013 22:21:18 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=17236#comment-705334 Hi Artie,

#1 I think the 200-400. Because in that situation (trecking in Tanzania), that lens brings you more flexibility. The other ones are more specific.
#2 You are using evaluative metering. The subject is against the sky, so you have to compesate all that ilumination. With the 24-105 and the 200-400 some dark objects compasate the luminosity of the sky, and with the 600mm You just have the bird.
#3 I like the third one

]]>