<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Head Hunting Tips&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/03/16/head-hunting-tips/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/03/16/head-hunting-tips/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2014 08:40:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan Cox		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/03/16/head-hunting-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-886555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Cox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 21:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=18861#comment-886555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Little bit of a typo.  It should have said &quot;that&#039;s the definition ..&quot;, meaning that if the observer&#039;s eyes are drawn in this case to that gap, then they are in fact being a little distracted.  You would likely rather their attention be directed straight to the rest of the bird and its face in particular.  It&#039;s really minor in this case.   I was just trying to make the point that any compositional element has the potential for being a distraction from the primary subject, and should be evaluated accordingly.  I think why I like this background so well is that it not only is not a distraction (because it&#039;s so well blurred), but its colors actually complement the colors in the bird.  All good!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Little bit of a typo.  It should have said &#8220;that&#8217;s the definition ..&#8221;, meaning that if the observer&#8217;s eyes are drawn in this case to that gap, then they are in fact being a little distracted.  You would likely rather their attention be directed straight to the rest of the bird and its face in particular.  It&#8217;s really minor in this case.   I was just trying to make the point that any compositional element has the potential for being a distraction from the primary subject, and should be evaluated accordingly.  I think why I like this background so well is that it not only is not a distraction (because it&#8217;s so well blurred), but its colors actually complement the colors in the bird.  All good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/03/16/head-hunting-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-886303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 18:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=18861#comment-886303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/03/16/head-hunting-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-886085&quot;&gt;Alan Cox&lt;/a&gt;.

Alan,  what does this mean?:  &quot;But that the definition of a distraction.&quot;

artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/03/16/head-hunting-tips/comment-page-1/#comment-886085">Alan Cox</a>.</p>
<p>Alan,  what does this mean?:  &#8220;But that the definition of a distraction.&#8221;</p>
<p>artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
