<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The EF 300mm f2.8L IS II: How Sharp is Sharp?  Part VI of a Series	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/09/14/the-ef-300mm-f2-8l-is-ii-how-sharp-is-sharp-part-vi-of-a-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/09/14/the-ef-300mm-f2-8l-is-ii-how-sharp-is-sharp-part-vi-of-a-series/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:50:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/09/14/the-ef-300mm-f2-8l-is-ii-how-sharp-is-sharp-part-vi-of-a-series/comment-page-1/#comment-1567272</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=22641#comment-1567272</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/09/14/the-ef-300mm-f2-8l-is-ii-how-sharp-is-sharp-part-vi-of-a-series/comment-page-1/#comment-1567267&quot;&gt;Quazi Ahmed Hussain&lt;/a&gt;.

They should b expected to remain sharp forever.  You might need to micro-adjust it or send it back to Canon along with your favored camera body.  artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/09/14/the-ef-300mm-f2-8l-is-ii-how-sharp-is-sharp-part-vi-of-a-series/comment-page-1/#comment-1567267">Quazi Ahmed Hussain</a>.</p>
<p>They should b expected to remain sharp forever.  You might need to micro-adjust it or send it back to Canon along with your favored camera body.  artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Quazi Ahmed Hussain		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2014/09/14/the-ef-300mm-f2-8l-is-ii-how-sharp-is-sharp-part-vi-of-a-series/comment-page-1/#comment-1567267</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Quazi Ahmed Hussain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 13:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=22641#comment-1567267</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Artie,

Greetings.

May I know how long Canon prosumer L lenses can be expected to remain sharp?  My 5 yr old EF 400mm f/5.6L USM seems to be producing little softer images of late.

Thanks in advance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Artie,</p>
<p>Greetings.</p>
<p>May I know how long Canon prosumer L lenses can be expected to remain sharp?  My 5 yr old EF 400mm f/5.6L USM seems to be producing little softer images of late.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
