<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Now You Are On the Spot: Image Quality/Which Camera Quiz: the first of many&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/08/now-you-are-on-the-spot-image-qualitywhich-camera-quiz-the-first-of-many/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/08/now-you-are-on-the-spot-image-qualitywhich-camera-quiz-the-first-of-many/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Soderling		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/08/now-you-are-on-the-spot-image-qualitywhich-camera-quiz-the-first-of-many/comment-page-1/#comment-1715362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Soderling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 21:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=26318#comment-1715362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would guess that image one was 1DX and image 2 the 7DII.  Although I saw something you took on another site that suggests it may be possible to get a pretty darn sharp image with the 7DII.

Actually, I can hardly believe that image 1 is really a 200% crop.  I didn&#039;t think it was possible to get a 200% image (which means to me that there are 4 screen pixels for every camera pixel) that looks this sharp!!

And NO!  I did not read any of the other posts before I wrote this comment!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would guess that image one was 1DX and image 2 the 7DII.  Although I saw something you took on another site that suggests it may be possible to get a pretty darn sharp image with the 7DII.</p>
<p>Actually, I can hardly believe that image 1 is really a 200% crop.  I didn&#8217;t think it was possible to get a 200% image (which means to me that there are 4 screen pixels for every camera pixel) that looks this sharp!!</p>
<p>And NO!  I did not read any of the other posts before I wrote this comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/08/now-you-are-on-the-spot-image-qualitywhich-camera-quiz-the-first-of-many/comment-page-1/#comment-1715337</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=26318#comment-1715337</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/08/now-you-are-on-the-spot-image-qualitywhich-camera-quiz-the-first-of-many/comment-page-1/#comment-1715240&quot;&gt;Doug Doornink&lt;/a&gt;.

Patience Doug.   I have not forgotten this one.   a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/08/now-you-are-on-the-spot-image-qualitywhich-camera-quiz-the-first-of-many/comment-page-1/#comment-1715240">Doug Doornink</a>.</p>
<p>Patience Doug.   I have not forgotten this one.   a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
