<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why Always Three at a Time ?  On the Spot Again: Image Quality/Camera Body Quiz #3	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/18/why-always-three-at-a-time-on-the-spot-again-image-qualitycamera-body-quiz-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/18/why-always-three-at-a-time-on-the-spot-again-image-qualitycamera-body-quiz-3/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:49:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/18/why-always-three-at-a-time-on-the-spot-again-image-qualitycamera-body-quiz-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1715799</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2015 10:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=26477#comment-1715799</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/18/why-always-three-at-a-time-on-the-spot-again-image-qualitycamera-body-quiz-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1715743&quot;&gt;Steve Soderling&lt;/a&gt;.

Me thinks that you might be expecting too much from the 1:1 crops of the converted TIFFs.   The detail in the WHITEs of the crane does look a lot like that in the recent Osprey image....  Revelations soon.   a

As I have been working a lot with Michael Tapes on the new release of FocusTune (coming in June I believe) do not dismiss AF issues; wait till you see some of what Michael calls &quot;the outliers.&quot;   Outlier: an observation point that is distant from other observations. 

artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/18/why-always-three-at-a-time-on-the-spot-again-image-qualitycamera-body-quiz-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1715743">Steve Soderling</a>.</p>
<p>Me thinks that you might be expecting too much from the 1:1 crops of the converted TIFFs.   The detail in the WHITEs of the crane does look a lot like that in the recent Osprey image&#8230;.  Revelations soon.   a</p>
<p>As I have been working a lot with Michael Tapes on the new release of FocusTune (coming in June I believe) do not dismiss AF issues; wait till you see some of what Michael calls &#8220;the outliers.&#8221;   Outlier: an observation point that is distant from other observations. </p>
<p>artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Soderling		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/18/why-always-three-at-a-time-on-the-spot-again-image-qualitycamera-body-quiz-3/comment-page-1/#comment-1715743</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Soderling]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2015 16:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=26477#comment-1715743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Artie,

I think you might have me on this one.  The full image really looks to me like the 1DX - super sharp, good contrast and really nice detail.  However, the 1:1 crop looks a little softer than I would expect, so from this, I would say that it is the 7DII.  On the other hand, since the 1DX only has 7MP in the APS-C sized part of its sensor (even fewer than my old 40D, which has 10MP), I could also be convinced that the pixel resolution in the 1DX isn&#039;t high enough to show a really sharp 1:1.  So I guess what I am saying here is that I really can&#039;t tell!

It would be interesting to see what your optimization techniques could do with the 1:1 crop or show us a same size blow-up of the same area from image #1.

Regarding the 3 shot sequence technique, I agree with you completely.  I developed a multi-shot technique like this on my own using my trusty 400mm 5.6 &#039;toy&#039; lens.  Since this lens has no stabilization, you really have to work to get sharp images and I learned very quickly to just leave the drive setting on high speed and take multiple shots every time I push the shutter button.  This obviously has more to do with photographer jitter than AF issues, but the multi-shot technique addresses both and the result is the same - multiple shots give you a much better chance to end up with a &#039;keeper&#039;. 

Steve]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Artie,</p>
<p>I think you might have me on this one.  The full image really looks to me like the 1DX &#8211; super sharp, good contrast and really nice detail.  However, the 1:1 crop looks a little softer than I would expect, so from this, I would say that it is the 7DII.  On the other hand, since the 1DX only has 7MP in the APS-C sized part of its sensor (even fewer than my old 40D, which has 10MP), I could also be convinced that the pixel resolution in the 1DX isn&#8217;t high enough to show a really sharp 1:1.  So I guess what I am saying here is that I really can&#8217;t tell!</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see what your optimization techniques could do with the 1:1 crop or show us a same size blow-up of the same area from image #1.</p>
<p>Regarding the 3 shot sequence technique, I agree with you completely.  I developed a multi-shot technique like this on my own using my trusty 400mm 5.6 &#8216;toy&#8217; lens.  Since this lens has no stabilization, you really have to work to get sharp images and I learned very quickly to just leave the drive setting on high speed and take multiple shots every time I push the shutter button.  This obviously has more to do with photographer jitter than AF issues, but the multi-shot technique addresses both and the result is the same &#8211; multiple shots give you a much better chance to end up with a &#8216;keeper&#8217;. </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
