<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gorgeous Bird, Gorgeous Light: Vary Your Compositions&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/30/gorgeous-bird-gorgeous-light-vary-your-compositions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/30/gorgeous-bird-gorgeous-light-vary-your-compositions/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 09:49:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gary Axten		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/30/gorgeous-bird-gorgeous-light-vary-your-compositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1716796</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Axten]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2015 09:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=26650#comment-1716796</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Heh it&#039;s hard to say when both are very good. I suppose it is the closeness of the image, in some it would be overwhelming but with this it highlights the strengths of the image; the contrasts, the richness of the beak and the details on the face. Though I do prefer the neck position on the second image. 

The different composure of the second image make it feel a little crowded whereas the first doesn&#039;t, I think I would like a little more space around the bird &#038; especially some space for the feet.

Oh, the slightly open bill in the second image is good as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh it&#8217;s hard to say when both are very good. I suppose it is the closeness of the image, in some it would be overwhelming but with this it highlights the strengths of the image; the contrasts, the richness of the beak and the details on the face. Though I do prefer the neck position on the second image. </p>
<p>The different composure of the second image make it feel a little crowded whereas the first doesn&#8217;t, I think I would like a little more space around the bird &amp; especially some space for the feet.</p>
<p>Oh, the slightly open bill in the second image is good as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/30/gorgeous-bird-gorgeous-light-vary-your-compositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1716730</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2015 20:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=26650#comment-1716730</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/30/gorgeous-bird-gorgeous-light-vary-your-compositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1716729&quot;&gt;Gary Axten&lt;/a&gt;.

Why?

Yes on the double highlight.  a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/04/30/gorgeous-bird-gorgeous-light-vary-your-compositions/comment-page-1/#comment-1716729">Gary Axten</a>.</p>
<p>Why?</p>
<p>Yes on the double highlight.  a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
