<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Should I Smash My 2X III TC With a Baseball Bat?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/16/should-i-smash-my-2x-iii-tc-with-a-baseball-bat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/16/should-i-smash-my-2x-iii-tc-with-a-baseball-bat/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:54:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/16/should-i-smash-my-2x-iii-tc-with-a-baseball-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-1725768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=28483#comment-1725768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/16/should-i-smash-my-2x-iii-tc-with-a-baseball-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-1725705&quot;&gt;John Spencer&lt;/a&gt;.

The 2X III TC was available when he made his original comments.    But good that he is open and willing to change. artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/16/should-i-smash-my-2x-iii-tc-with-a-baseball-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-1725705">John Spencer</a>.</p>
<p>The 2X III TC was available when he made his original comments.    But good that he is open and willing to change. artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Spencer		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/16/should-i-smash-my-2x-iii-tc-with-a-baseball-bat/comment-page-1/#comment-1725705</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Spencer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2015 23:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=28483#comment-1725705</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great shot Artie, confirms what I have always suspected - that any poor images with the X2 are more likely to be due to my poor technique. To be fair to Andy he has put the bat down recently, hope he doesn&#039;t mind me quoting this:- &quot;I regularly used the Canon 2x teleconverter for a lot of my work. Now usually I hate the 2x converter but the version 3 is great and sharp....provided you shoot it at f11 or f16. Now usually shooting anything at this high aperture would mean a lot of annoying background in focus, but not with the 2x, there is nothing in focus!!! Shooting at such a high aperture ensures that the image given by the converter is sharp. I adopt the same policy for the 1.4x converter as well. shooting f8 with this one.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great shot Artie, confirms what I have always suspected &#8211; that any poor images with the X2 are more likely to be due to my poor technique. To be fair to Andy he has put the bat down recently, hope he doesn&#8217;t mind me quoting this:- &#8220;I regularly used the Canon 2x teleconverter for a lot of my work. Now usually I hate the 2x converter but the version 3 is great and sharp&#8230;.provided you shoot it at f11 or f16. Now usually shooting anything at this high aperture would mean a lot of annoying background in focus, but not with the 2x, there is nothing in focus!!! Shooting at such a high aperture ensures that the image given by the converter is sharp. I adopt the same policy for the 1.4x converter as well. shooting f8 with this one.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
