<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Benefit of Gale Force Winds&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/24/a-benefit-of-gale-force-winds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/24/a-benefit-of-gale-force-winds/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan Beus		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/24/a-benefit-of-gale-force-winds/comment-page-1/#comment-1725535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Beus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=28669#comment-1725535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been following your blog for some time now, but this is my first time to chime in.

I think I like your first picture of the Mendenhall glacier best. It&#039;s a better presentation of the subject and gives more depth. I do like the texture and colors of the second, but it&#039;s too flat due to compression, given the focal length. I&#039;d like it better if there were something in the second picture to give me a sense of scale.

What prompted me to respond here is that I was there on August 13 with the same two lenses but different full frame body. It was interesting to compare your images to my own.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following your blog for some time now, but this is my first time to chime in.</p>
<p>I think I like your first picture of the Mendenhall glacier best. It&#8217;s a better presentation of the subject and gives more depth. I do like the texture and colors of the second, but it&#8217;s too flat due to compression, given the focal length. I&#8217;d like it better if there were something in the second picture to give me a sense of scale.</p>
<p>What prompted me to respond here is that I was there on August 13 with the same two lenses but different full frame body. It was interesting to compare your images to my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Peake		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/24/a-benefit-of-gale-force-winds/comment-page-1/#comment-1725512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Peake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=28669#comment-1725512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Love a dramatic sky ,image one,but the tight view on the glacier is beautiful so
No 2 is my choice. I do love the way the blues come out from deep within the cracks in the ice.
Enjoy the trip.
DP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love a dramatic sky ,image one,but the tight view on the glacier is beautiful so<br />
No 2 is my choice. I do love the way the blues come out from deep within the cracks in the ice.<br />
Enjoy the trip.<br />
DP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
