<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wholly Cows!  With the Canon 200-400mm f/L IS lens with the internal extender	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/29/wholly-cows-with-the-canon-200-400mm-fl-is-lens-with-the-internal-extender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/29/wholly-cows-with-the-canon-200-400mm-fl-is-lens-with-the-internal-extender/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:29:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/29/wholly-cows-with-the-canon-200-400mm-fl-is-lens-with-the-internal-extender/comment-page-1/#comment-1725942</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=28092#comment-1725942</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/29/wholly-cows-with-the-canon-200-400mm-fl-is-lens-with-the-internal-extender/comment-page-1/#comment-1725652&quot;&gt;Jonas Heiman&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Jonas but your comments leave me very confused....  artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/29/wholly-cows-with-the-canon-200-400mm-fl-is-lens-with-the-internal-extender/comment-page-1/#comment-1725652">Jonas Heiman</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Jonas but your comments leave me very confused&#8230;.  artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jonas Heiman		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2015/08/29/wholly-cows-with-the-canon-200-400mm-fl-is-lens-with-the-internal-extender/comment-page-1/#comment-1725652</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonas Heiman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 14:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=28092#comment-1725652</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can i just make a complement to the excellent comment made by David Peake. My thinking is that if having the 17% grey in mind (for the metered area) I would compensate with adding light when the average tone is lighter than my assumption of 17% greyfor the same area).  This would give me the compensation for one of the motives. Then compensate for the further deviations from the cameras assumption of normal exposure (17%grey). Hope it make any sense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can i just make a complement to the excellent comment made by David Peake. My thinking is that if having the 17% grey in mind (for the metered area) I would compensate with adding light when the average tone is lighter than my assumption of 17% greyfor the same area).  This would give me the compensation for one of the motives. Then compensate for the further deviations from the cameras assumption of normal exposure (17%grey). Hope it make any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
