<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Picking Your Keepers 101&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/01/30/picking-your-keepers-101/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/01/30/picking-your-keepers-101/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 21:34:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Pugsley		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/01/30/picking-your-keepers-101/comment-page-1/#comment-1730348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Pugsley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2016 17:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=31266#comment-1730348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The shadows/plane of focus should be level assuming the beach is level.

The first part of your question is an easy call, trash #2 due to the head angle. 
As for the best, hmmm, I need to bullet-point my thoughts. 
- like HA of #1 due to the playful tllt towards you, but points of others surpass this
- love the tongue of #3 
- prefer the raised foot of #4
- like the BG vegetation in #3

For me, if I really wanted to construct my ideal shot, I&#039;d take the head from #3 and place it on #4. From there I&#039;d lower the bird in the frame a bit and bring the vegetation from #3 and place it in the upper left corner for balance. 

Summary: 4 as base image with the head and vegetation of 3. 

A simpler final would be 4 as base image with just the vegetation from 3. 

Hope that made sense. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shadows/plane of focus should be level assuming the beach is level.</p>
<p>The first part of your question is an easy call, trash #2 due to the head angle.<br />
As for the best, hmmm, I need to bullet-point my thoughts.<br />
&#8211; like HA of #1 due to the playful tllt towards you, but points of others surpass this<br />
&#8211; love the tongue of #3<br />
&#8211; prefer the raised foot of #4<br />
&#8211; like the BG vegetation in #3</p>
<p>For me, if I really wanted to construct my ideal shot, I&#8217;d take the head from #3 and place it on #4. From there I&#8217;d lower the bird in the frame a bit and bring the vegetation from #3 and place it in the upper left corner for balance. </p>
<p>Summary: 4 as base image with the head and vegetation of 3. </p>
<p>A simpler final would be 4 as base image with just the vegetation from 3. </p>
<p>Hope that made sense. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/01/30/picking-your-keepers-101/comment-page-1/#comment-1730329</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:41:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=31266#comment-1730329</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/01/30/picking-your-keepers-101/comment-page-1/#comment-1730323&quot;&gt;Kathleen Graff&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks.  So San Diego, or Nickerson, or Japan or the UK 2017 :)  a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/01/30/picking-your-keepers-101/comment-page-1/#comment-1730323">Kathleen Graff</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks.  So San Diego, or Nickerson, or Japan or the UK 2017 🙂  a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
