<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Back in Action&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/03/29/back-in-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/03/29/back-in-action/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed Lusby		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/03/29/back-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1733816</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed Lusby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 16:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=32488#comment-1733816</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Artie,
I love your site and your exhibition in SD. Great images!
My comments refer to your first image above, which I really like. It is so hard to make an image that is different, and this one works very well. I really like the feather detail over the head of the bird. I&#039;m not sure how they got there, but that&#039;s part of the appeal of the image.
It&#039;s also a good image to discuss the rules of photography. A couple of &quot;rules&quot; in play here: 
1. Thou shalt always focus on a bird&#039;s eye
2. Thou shalt never center an image
Personally, I wouldn&#039;t worry about focusing on the eye in this image, since it&#039;s almost invisible. I would focus on the feathers. 
I find it disturbing that the Rule of Thirds so dominates photography that one doesn&#039;t dare to take a shot like this with the bird centered. I know, I know, but there I&#039;ve said it. I saw an exhibition some years back in the same place where your exhibit is/was. It was a head/shoulders portrait with a black background and horizontal format. The person&#039;s image was at the far right and half the canvas was empty black. Is this what we&#039;ve come to? I&#039;m not saying that I would necessarily prefer the heron centered, as I like your composition too. I just think it should be a matter of personal taste, but it is not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Artie,<br />
I love your site and your exhibition in SD. Great images!<br />
My comments refer to your first image above, which I really like. It is so hard to make an image that is different, and this one works very well. I really like the feather detail over the head of the bird. I&#8217;m not sure how they got there, but that&#8217;s part of the appeal of the image.<br />
It&#8217;s also a good image to discuss the rules of photography. A couple of &#8220;rules&#8221; in play here:<br />
1. Thou shalt always focus on a bird&#8217;s eye<br />
2. Thou shalt never center an image<br />
Personally, I wouldn&#8217;t worry about focusing on the eye in this image, since it&#8217;s almost invisible. I would focus on the feathers.<br />
I find it disturbing that the Rule of Thirds so dominates photography that one doesn&#8217;t dare to take a shot like this with the bird centered. I know, I know, but there I&#8217;ve said it. I saw an exhibition some years back in the same place where your exhibit is/was. It was a head/shoulders portrait with a black background and horizontal format. The person&#8217;s image was at the far right and half the canvas was empty black. Is this what we&#8217;ve come to? I&#8217;m not saying that I would necessarily prefer the heron centered, as I like your composition too. I just think it should be a matter of personal taste, but it is not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wtlloyd		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/03/29/back-in-action/comment-page-1/#comment-1733566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wtlloyd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 02:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=32488#comment-1733566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great image. I like how the foreground whitewash helps define the shape of the ...foreground. It really makes the subtle curve of the rock pop out from the background.
Re: the background whitewash - couldn&#039;t you mask and select for the background and merely pull the whites down a taste? I agree, no matter how subtle, I rarely like it when I know someone has used something like a gaussian blur to soften the background/mimic OOF objects.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great image. I like how the foreground whitewash helps define the shape of the &#8230;foreground. It really makes the subtle curve of the rock pop out from the background.<br />
Re: the background whitewash &#8211; couldn&#8217;t you mask and select for the background and merely pull the whites down a taste? I agree, no matter how subtle, I rarely like it when I know someone has used something like a gaussian blur to soften the background/mimic OOF objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
