<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Can Photography Actually Be Simple? Or is it Genetic? And 1DX II Comments&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/05/08/can-photography-actually-be-simple-or-is-it-genetic-and-1dx-ii-comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/05/08/can-photography-actually-be-simple-or-is-it-genetic-and-1dx-ii-comments/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 00:54:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/05/08/can-photography-actually-be-simple-or-is-it-genetic-and-1dx-ii-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1735003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2016 00:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=33028#comment-1735003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/05/08/can-photography-actually-be-simple-or-is-it-genetic-and-1dx-ii-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1734999&quot;&gt;Steve Rentmeesters&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks and fixed.  Camera choice is now easy for me.  For flight, action,and high ISO situations I go to the 1D X II.  For portraits, static stuff, flowers, Urbex and the like, it&#039;s the 5DS R.  I also lean towards the 1DX II when using the 2X III TC... artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/05/08/can-photography-actually-be-simple-or-is-it-genetic-and-1dx-ii-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1734999">Steve Rentmeesters</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks and fixed.  Camera choice is now easy for me.  For flight, action,and high ISO situations I go to the 1D X II.  For portraits, static stuff, flowers, Urbex and the like, it&#8217;s the 5DS R.  I also lean towards the 1DX II when using the 2X III TC&#8230; artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Rentmeesters		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/05/08/can-photography-actually-be-simple-or-is-it-genetic-and-1dx-ii-comments/comment-page-1/#comment-1734999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Rentmeesters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2016 21:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=33028#comment-1734999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You have a typo in the e-mail conversation with RP. You mention a 400 DI II, but I think you mean 400 DO II. Many interesting comments, seems like a post on when to use each type of camera body would be helpful to people. Like when to use different film types in the old days :-)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have a typo in the e-mail conversation with RP. You mention a 400 DI II, but I think you mean 400 DO II. Many interesting comments, seems like a post on when to use each type of camera body would be helpful to people. Like when to use different film types in the old days 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
