<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The New EOS 5D Mark IV Shipping September 8, 2016	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/08/25/the-new-eos-5d-mark-iv-shipping-september-8-2016/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/08/25/the-new-eos-5d-mark-iv-shipping-september-8-2016/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:15:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/08/25/the-new-eos-5d-mark-iv-shipping-september-8-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1737997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 16:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=35001#comment-1737997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/08/25/the-new-eos-5d-mark-iv-shipping-september-8-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1737996&quot;&gt;Jay&lt;/a&gt;.

It sounds as if you need the reach.  So the 500 II plus the 1.4X III TC.  You do not need the 2X III TC with a 7D II.  If you lived in Florida with tame birds it would be a different story.  Head to BPN and check out the great work that Avian Moderator Dan Cadieux does with the 500 II and a 7D II.  

a

ps: You can start &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.birdphotographers.net/forums/showthread.php/136970-Semipalmated-Sandpiper-Marching-Downhill&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and follow up with a search for more of Dan&#039;s great images. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/08/25/the-new-eos-5d-mark-iv-shipping-september-8-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1737996">Jay</a>.</p>
<p>It sounds as if you need the reach.  So the 500 II plus the 1.4X III TC.  You do not need the 2X III TC with a 7D II.  If you lived in Florida with tame birds it would be a different story.  Head to BPN and check out the great work that Avian Moderator Dan Cadieux does with the 500 II and a 7D II.  </p>
<p>a</p>
<p>ps: You can start <a href="http://www.birdphotographers.net/forums/showthread.php/136970-Semipalmated-Sandpiper-Marching-Downhill" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">here</a> and follow up with a search for more of Dan&#8217;s great images. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/08/25/the-new-eos-5d-mark-iv-shipping-september-8-2016/comment-page-1/#comment-1737996</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=35001#comment-1737996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks Artie. And at the risk of asking annoying questions... If you only had the money to buy a 500 II to go with a 7D II or to buy a 5D IV to go with the 100-400 II, what would the choice be? I&#039;ve always heard go with the best glass, but the 100-400 II isn&#039;t exactly bad glass.

I&#039;ve been doing photography for over a decade, mostly as a walk-around birder. I&#039;m extremely interested in focusing on photography more and getting the extra reach of the 500. I also would like better performance in dark places.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Artie. And at the risk of asking annoying questions&#8230; If you only had the money to buy a 500 II to go with a 7D II or to buy a 5D IV to go with the 100-400 II, what would the choice be? I&#8217;ve always heard go with the best glass, but the 100-400 II isn&#8217;t exactly bad glass.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been doing photography for over a decade, mostly as a walk-around birder. I&#8217;m extremely interested in focusing on photography more and getting the extra reach of the 500. I also would like better performance in dark places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
