<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Simplicity at f/2.8&#8230; On Diagonal Compositions. And a What You See is What You Get Depth-of-Field Reminder	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/09/24/simplicity-at-f2-8-on-diagonal-compositions-and-a-what-you-see-is-what-you-get-depth-of-field-reminder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/09/24/simplicity-at-f2-8-on-diagonal-compositions-and-a-what-you-see-is-what-you-get-depth-of-field-reminder/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 15:05:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/09/24/simplicity-at-f2-8-on-diagonal-compositions-and-a-what-you-see-is-what-you-get-depth-of-field-reminder/comment-page-1/#comment-1738693</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 15:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=36120#comment-1738693</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/09/24/simplicity-at-f2-8-on-diagonal-compositions-and-a-what-you-see-is-what-you-get-depth-of-field-reminder/comment-page-1/#comment-1738686&quot;&gt;Corey&lt;/a&gt;.

Certainly true to some degree but do realize that the guidelines that have been pointing artists in the right direction for centuries do have some merit :)

My thoughts are to know em all and break when you want and when you have a reason.

a]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/09/24/simplicity-at-f2-8-on-diagonal-compositions-and-a-what-you-see-is-what-you-get-depth-of-field-reminder/comment-page-1/#comment-1738686">Corey</a>.</p>
<p>Certainly true to some degree but do realize that the guidelines that have been pointing artists in the right direction for centuries do have some merit 🙂</p>
<p>My thoughts are to know em all and break when you want and when you have a reason.</p>
<p>a</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Corey		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/09/24/simplicity-at-f2-8-on-diagonal-compositions-and-a-what-you-see-is-what-you-get-depth-of-field-reminder/comment-page-1/#comment-1738686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Corey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2016 13:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=36120#comment-1738686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Diagonal from a corner - I would say there are no rules. What might look good in one image might not in another - there are so many other factors such as colour and subject matter, emotions etc that have to be taken into account in each photo. It seems someone is always quoting this or that rule, ,such as the rule of thirds as if it means something, but all good art has to be beyond this kind of pigeon holing. The guys and girls who quote these rules often haven&#039;t got a clue how to take a great picture because they get caught up in cookie cutter &#039;seeing&#039;. My 2 cents.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diagonal from a corner &#8211; I would say there are no rules. What might look good in one image might not in another &#8211; there are so many other factors such as colour and subject matter, emotions etc that have to be taken into account in each photo. It seems someone is always quoting this or that rule, ,such as the rule of thirds as if it means something, but all good art has to be beyond this kind of pigeon holing. The guys and girls who quote these rules often haven&#8217;t got a clue how to take a great picture because they get caught up in cookie cutter &#8216;seeing&#8217;. My 2 cents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
