<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Canon 100-400 II/5DS R Displaying Brandt&#8217;s Cormorant on the Nest: Which Crop?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/11/08/canon-100-400-ii5ds-r-displaying-brandts-cormorant-on-the-nest-which-crop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/11/08/canon-100-400-ii5ds-r-displaying-brandts-cormorant-on-the-nest-which-crop/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:33:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kylie Jones		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/11/08/canon-100-400-ii5ds-r-displaying-brandts-cormorant-on-the-nest-which-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-1740179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kylie Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=35042#comment-1740179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The original image to me feels like it needs a crop, and the boxy crop feels too boxed in and gives me the optical illusion that the image is distorted vertically, which I know it isn&#039;t.

I prefer the 3x2 crop, I like the way Nick describes it, and add to that the curve of the cliff at the right creates a peaceful leading line into the shot, and good balance. Also, the negative space of the creamy background particularly to the right is the space for the bird to go - if that makes sense.. normally you want to give room in front of the bird so it feels like the bird has &quot;somewhere to go&quot;, but in the case of a bird roosting on a cliff, if its how I imagine, to depart the nest the bird needs to turn around and fly off to the right, so though it breaks the normal rules of subject placement, it matches the natural world&#039;s rules and works.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original image to me feels like it needs a crop, and the boxy crop feels too boxed in and gives me the optical illusion that the image is distorted vertically, which I know it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I prefer the 3&#215;2 crop, I like the way Nick describes it, and add to that the curve of the cliff at the right creates a peaceful leading line into the shot, and good balance. Also, the negative space of the creamy background particularly to the right is the space for the bird to go &#8211; if that makes sense.. normally you want to give room in front of the bird so it feels like the bird has &#8220;somewhere to go&#8221;, but in the case of a bird roosting on a cliff, if its how I imagine, to depart the nest the bird needs to turn around and fly off to the right, so though it breaks the normal rules of subject placement, it matches the natural world&#8217;s rules and works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2016/11/08/canon-100-400-ii5ds-r-displaying-brandts-cormorant-on-the-nest-which-crop/comment-page-1/#comment-1739989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 15:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=35042#comment-1739989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks to everyone who chimed in, especially the new folks.  

artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks to everyone who chimed in, especially the new folks.  </p>
<p>artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
