<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Snowy Snow Monkeys	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/02/20/snowy-snow-monkeys/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/02/20/snowy-snow-monkeys/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce Finocchio		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/02/20/snowy-snow-monkeys/comment-page-1/#comment-1743536</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Finocchio]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 06:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=46237#comment-1743536</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Artie,

I am going to disagree. I like #1 snow monkey image better. It has a clean view of the monkey&#039;s face and you have a sense of the spirit of this monkey. Whereas in the second image, you see some eyes, but it&#039;s hard for an average viewer to really discern what animal it is--almost too much mystery. Also, I think that the eyes here are looking away. It would have been a much more powerful image if the eyes were looking directly at the viewer or photographer. Then, you would have the sense that you were looking into its soul, as the eyes engaged you directly. Not sure if you are having more sessions with the snow monkeys. I would try the same technique of shooting a face surround by the heads of the other monkeys but wait until the moment when the subject monkey&#039;s eyes directly engage you. In my opinion, I think this would be a more powerful and haunting image. As a reference image, I think most of us would remember, Frans Lanting&#039;s Mountain Lion cover image to one of his earlier books. Where he included just the face with those enchanting and dominant large cat eyes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Artie,</p>
<p>I am going to disagree. I like #1 snow monkey image better. It has a clean view of the monkey&#8217;s face and you have a sense of the spirit of this monkey. Whereas in the second image, you see some eyes, but it&#8217;s hard for an average viewer to really discern what animal it is&#8211;almost too much mystery. Also, I think that the eyes here are looking away. It would have been a much more powerful image if the eyes were looking directly at the viewer or photographer. Then, you would have the sense that you were looking into its soul, as the eyes engaged you directly. Not sure if you are having more sessions with the snow monkeys. I would try the same technique of shooting a face surround by the heads of the other monkeys but wait until the moment when the subject monkey&#8217;s eyes directly engage you. In my opinion, I think this would be a more powerful and haunting image. As a reference image, I think most of us would remember, Frans Lanting&#8217;s Mountain Lion cover image to one of his earlier books. Where he included just the face with those enchanting and dominant large cat eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Faraaz Abdool		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/02/20/snowy-snow-monkeys/comment-page-1/#comment-1743530</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faraaz Abdool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 02:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=46237#comment-1743530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lovely images, my pick would be #2. The image has almost a landscape feel to it, the foreground snow could easily be some snow-tipped bushes. The fact that you&#039;re not seeing its nose adds to the coldness of the environment that the viewer can almost feel. Add the casual sideways glance - this means that it ain&#039;t moving from its warm spot, not even to glance across at that female that just got out of the hot tub. 

Lots more to make the eye wander and the mind wonder.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely images, my pick would be #2. The image has almost a landscape feel to it, the foreground snow could easily be some snow-tipped bushes. The fact that you&#8217;re not seeing its nose adds to the coldness of the environment that the viewer can almost feel. Add the casual sideways glance &#8211; this means that it ain&#8217;t moving from its warm spot, not even to glance across at that female that just got out of the hot tub. </p>
<p>Lots more to make the eye wander and the mind wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
