<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Keep or Delete Cluttered Pelican Image?  100-400 II/5D Mark IV for Flight in LaJolla. And Pretty Cool Image Optimization.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/06/26/keep-or-delete-cluttered-pelican-image-100-400-ii5d-mark-iv-for-flight-in-lajolla-and-pretty-neat-image-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/06/26/keep-or-delete-cluttered-pelican-image-100-400-ii5d-mark-iv-for-flight-in-lajolla-and-pretty-neat-image-optimization/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 22:06:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug West		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/06/26/keep-or-delete-cluttered-pelican-image-100-400-ii5d-mark-iv-for-flight-in-lajolla-and-pretty-neat-image-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1748695</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug West]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2017 09:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=48631#comment-1748695</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would pick the first one, with the pelican in the lower corner.

The other one, it just seems like the pelican is landing into
&#039;nothingness&#039;. If there was something else there, more rock,
more ocean...anything, I&#039;d pick the second. But the way it
is...#1 for me.

Doug]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would pick the first one, with the pelican in the lower corner.</p>
<p>The other one, it just seems like the pelican is landing into<br />
&#8216;nothingness&#8217;. If there was something else there, more rock,<br />
more ocean&#8230;anything, I&#8217;d pick the second. But the way it<br />
is&#8230;#1 for me.</p>
<p>Doug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: byron prinzmetal		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/06/26/keep-or-delete-cluttered-pelican-image-100-400-ii5d-mark-iv-for-flight-in-lajolla-and-pretty-neat-image-optimization/comment-page-1/#comment-1748686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[byron prinzmetal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=48631#comment-1748686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You wanted to know about the 80d perhaps vs 7d2.  I have both.  The 80d has the better, newer Canon sensor.  It has almost the same af options as the 7d2 without I think Canon calls them af classes (a big omission in my opinion).  It is somewhat slower than the 7d2.  It has live view with dpaf which means when using live view one does not have to do lens micro adjustments (a big plus for me.).  But, if the dpaf is the same as in the m5, the af sensors are not cross type only vertical.  The 80d is somewhat lighter and smaller.  When shooting sports or bif I always use my 7d2.  Before I bought my m5 I carried my 80d everywhere I went.  I have a bad back, I hike almost every day and I am getting old (73) so the m5 works for me (small and pretty lite) for everything other than for moving objects so my 80d is not used much anymore.  The m5 and 80d have about (maybe the same) sensor.  The m5 is not: a sports camera, bif flight camera, low light camera, flash camera and the af options are limited and not as easy to use as say the 7d2 (some will disagree), but for hiking (landscape), flowers, street photography, etc for someone who does not make a living selling images who is old and grey, it is a fine tool.  By the way, the m5 can use all Canon lens with an adapter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You wanted to know about the 80d perhaps vs 7d2.  I have both.  The 80d has the better, newer Canon sensor.  It has almost the same af options as the 7d2 without I think Canon calls them af classes (a big omission in my opinion).  It is somewhat slower than the 7d2.  It has live view with dpaf which means when using live view one does not have to do lens micro adjustments (a big plus for me.).  But, if the dpaf is the same as in the m5, the af sensors are not cross type only vertical.  The 80d is somewhat lighter and smaller.  When shooting sports or bif I always use my 7d2.  Before I bought my m5 I carried my 80d everywhere I went.  I have a bad back, I hike almost every day and I am getting old (73) so the m5 works for me (small and pretty lite) for everything other than for moving objects so my 80d is not used much anymore.  The m5 and 80d have about (maybe the same) sensor.  The m5 is not: a sports camera, bif flight camera, low light camera, flash camera and the af options are limited and not as easy to use as say the 7d2 (some will disagree), but for hiking (landscape), flowers, street photography, etc for someone who does not make a living selling images who is old and grey, it is a fine tool.  By the way, the m5 can use all Canon lens with an adapter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
