<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: My Thoughts on the 500 II vs the 600 II for the UK IPT. And the Mega-cooperative Murre	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 05:28:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/comment-page-1/#comment-1748882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 05:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=48878#comment-1748882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/comment-page-1/#comment-1748873&quot;&gt;Jake&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Jake,

Thanks for your kind words. I think that all murres show the brown curved line behind the eye. With the bridled form, that line is distinctly white.  I did not miss the faster frame rate (well less than 14fps in AI Servo AF if you read the fine print). See lots more coming soon and see my reply to Kent above. 



with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/comment-page-1/#comment-1748873">Jake</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Jake,</p>
<p>Thanks for your kind words. I think that all murres show the brown curved line behind the eye. With the bridled form, that line is distinctly white.  I did not miss the faster frame rate (well less than 14fps in AI Servo AF if you read the fine print). See lots more coming soon and see my reply to Kent above. </p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/comment-page-1/#comment-1748881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jul 2017 05:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=48878#comment-1748881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/comment-page-1/#comment-1748877&quot;&gt;Kent Downing&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Kent,  YAW and thanks for your kind words. The 100-400 II is fine for action. Not many opps for flight at close range here. With my deteriorating flight photography skills, I found yesterday that the 70-200 f/4L IS with the gannets far our-performed the 100-400 II with the 1DX II.  Not sure why and not a direct or fair comparison but, I was surprised. 

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/07/07/my-thoughts-on-the-500-ii-vs-the-600-ii-for-the-uk-ipt-and-the-mega-cooperative-murre/comment-page-1/#comment-1748877">Kent Downing</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Kent,  YAW and thanks for your kind words. The 100-400 II is fine for action. Not many opps for flight at close range here. With my deteriorating flight photography skills, I found yesterday that the 70-200 f/4L IS with the gannets far our-performed the 100-400 II with the 1DX II.  Not sure why and not a direct or fair comparison but, I was surprised. </p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
