<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Blue-Footed Booby Diving Part III	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/10/06/blue-footed-booby-diving-part-iii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/10/06/blue-footed-booby-diving-part-iii/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 17:14:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jake		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/10/06/blue-footed-booby-diving-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-1751792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 17:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=50651#comment-1751792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Artie, I really like this image. This, in my opinion, is the most impressive out of your three diving blue footed booby posts. I think the main reason is the background separation, in this image the bird really &#039;pops&#039; out, something that I didn&#039;t see in the other two images. On the topic of the background the different layers provide extra interest whilst not drawing attention away from the booby. The water droplets just add the finishing touch. I didn&#039;t notice the bill problem until reading the comments but when you&#039;re looking for it, it is quite noticeable. I&#039;m also intrigued,
Jake]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Artie, I really like this image. This, in my opinion, is the most impressive out of your three diving blue footed booby posts. I think the main reason is the background separation, in this image the bird really &#8216;pops&#8217; out, something that I didn&#8217;t see in the other two images. On the topic of the background the different layers provide extra interest whilst not drawing attention away from the booby. The water droplets just add the finishing touch. I didn&#8217;t notice the bill problem until reading the comments but when you&#8217;re looking for it, it is quite noticeable. I&#8217;m also intrigued,<br />
Jake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/10/06/blue-footed-booby-diving-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-1751790</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Oct 2017 16:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=50651#comment-1751790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/10/06/blue-footed-booby-diving-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-1751787&quot;&gt;Ted Willcox&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Ted.  I like it too :)

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2017/10/06/blue-footed-booby-diving-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-1751787">Ted Willcox</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Ted.  I like it too 🙂</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
