<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why 600mm for Bird Photography? Teleconverter Strategies in the Field. And First Winter Shorebird (Dunlin) Lessons	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/05/03/why-600mm-for-bird-photography-teleconverter-strategies-in-the-field-and-first-winter-shorebird-dunlin-lessons/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/05/03/why-600mm-for-bird-photography-teleconverter-strategies-in-the-field-and-first-winter-shorebird-dunlin-lessons/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 18:23:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Thach		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/05/03/why-600mm-for-bird-photography-teleconverter-strategies-in-the-field-and-first-winter-shorebird-dunlin-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-1757058</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Thach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 18:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=55527#comment-1757058</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;ll like the 1.7 and I look forward to reading your thoughts on it and seeing what you capture with it. To me, it has near the quality of the 1.4 and near the reach of the 2.0. I still use the 1.4 the most with my 500 f/4 but I basically retired my 2.0 when I finally purchased a 1.7 a couple of years ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll like the 1.7 and I look forward to reading your thoughts on it and seeing what you capture with it. To me, it has near the quality of the 1.4 and near the reach of the 2.0. I still use the 1.4 the most with my 500 f/4 but I basically retired my 2.0 when I finally purchased a 1.7 a couple of years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/05/03/why-600mm-for-bird-photography-teleconverter-strategies-in-the-field-and-first-winter-shorebird-dunlin-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-1757056</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 17:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=55527#comment-1757056</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/05/03/why-600mm-for-bird-photography-teleconverter-strategies-in-the-field-and-first-winter-shorebird-dunlin-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-1757051&quot;&gt;Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART&lt;/a&gt;.

While that makes intuitive sense, Canon always recommends attaching the TC first to the lens and then the tc/lens assembly to the camera.  I am not sure why this would be the case other than minimize the possibility of the camera being on and possibly causing some kind of short or current discharge while attaching the camera/tc to the lens?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/05/03/why-600mm-for-bird-photography-teleconverter-strategies-in-the-field-and-first-winter-shorebird-dunlin-lessons/comment-page-1/#comment-1757051">Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART</a>.</p>
<p>While that makes intuitive sense, Canon always recommends attaching the TC first to the lens and then the tc/lens assembly to the camera.  I am not sure why this would be the case other than minimize the possibility of the camera being on and possibly causing some kind of short or current discharge while attaching the camera/tc to the lens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
