<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Best Available Subjects &#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/comment-page-1/#comment-1757755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=56496#comment-1757755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/comment-page-1/#comment-1757748&quot;&gt;John Mack&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks John.

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/comment-page-1/#comment-1757748">John Mack</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks John.</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/comment-page-1/#comment-1757754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 04:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=56496#comment-1757754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/comment-page-1/#comment-1757742&quot;&gt;Sue Jarrett&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Sue,

You are missing one major point as far as depth of field goes. The greater the distance to the subject, the greater the d-o-f.  If you photograph a bird with a 600mm lens and then again with the 80-400 with a 1.4X teleconverter and the bird is the same size in the frame the depth of field will be identical. Only the angle of view will be different .

The whole bird in Image #4 is in sharp focus because I was effectively a lot farther from the subject than I was in Image #3.

You did not, therefore, learn what you think that you learned ...

with love, artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/07/09/the-best-available-subjects/comment-page-1/#comment-1757742">Sue Jarrett</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Sue,</p>
<p>You are missing one major point as far as depth of field goes. The greater the distance to the subject, the greater the d-o-f.  If you photograph a bird with a 600mm lens and then again with the 80-400 with a 1.4X teleconverter and the bird is the same size in the frame the depth of field will be identical. Only the angle of view will be different .</p>
<p>The whole bird in Image #4 is in sharp focus because I was effectively a lot farther from the subject than I was in Image #3.</p>
<p>You did not, therefore, learn what you think that you learned &#8230;</p>
<p>with love, artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
