<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How&#8217;s Your Eagle Eye? Do you see any evidence of Photoshop Foul Play?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/11/25/hows-your-eagle-eye-do-you-see-any-evidence-of-photoshop-foul-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/11/25/hows-your-eagle-eye-do-you-see-any-evidence-of-photoshop-foul-play/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:22:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/11/25/hows-your-eagle-eye-do-you-see-any-evidence-of-photoshop-foul-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1760355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=58445#comment-1760355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/11/25/hows-your-eagle-eye-do-you-see-any-evidence-of-photoshop-foul-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1760354&quot;&gt;MK&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi MK,

Assumptions are always made at your own risk.  I have been repairing clipped wings and wingtips and more for more than 15 years now. I always let folks (and in the old days when it was possible to sell a photograph -- editors) know when I have done anything major in Photoshop. Such images are never entered in contests where such repairs are not allowed. That said, while it is easy to do a sloppy job of adding a wingtip or a toe, doing those repairs well is a skill that needs to be developed. Everything that I did to repair the image above, is detailed in &lt;a href=&quot;http://birdsasart-shop.com/the-birds-as-art-current-workflow-e-guide-digital-basics-ii/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;noopener nofollow&quot;&gt;Digital Basics II&lt;/a&gt;, but it will take most folks a while and lots of study and practice to learn to do it well. 

And BTW, background clean-up is NOT allowed in most major contests. What you do with your images is your business. 

artie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/11/25/hows-your-eagle-eye-do-you-see-any-evidence-of-photoshop-foul-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1760354">MK</a>.</p>
<p>Hi MK,</p>
<p>Assumptions are always made at your own risk.  I have been repairing clipped wings and wingtips and more for more than 15 years now. I always let folks (and in the old days when it was possible to sell a photograph &#8212; editors) know when I have done anything major in Photoshop. Such images are never entered in contests where such repairs are not allowed. That said, while it is easy to do a sloppy job of adding a wingtip or a toe, doing those repairs well is a skill that needs to be developed. Everything that I did to repair the image above, is detailed in <a href="http://birdsasart-shop.com/the-birds-as-art-current-workflow-e-guide-digital-basics-ii/" target="_blank" rel="noopener nofollow">Digital Basics II</a>, but it will take most folks a while and lots of study and practice to learn to do it well. </p>
<p>And BTW, background clean-up is NOT allowed in most major contests. What you do with your images is your business. </p>
<p>artie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MK		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2018/11/25/hows-your-eagle-eye-do-you-see-any-evidence-of-photoshop-foul-play/comment-page-1/#comment-1760354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 16:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=58445#comment-1760354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Arthur,

Fabulous images!

I have a question about the edits: while background &quot;cleanup&quot; may be acceptable, should one really be doing any mods at all to the primary subject? I have been under the (possibly naive) impression that all wildlife images and flower images have the primary subject &quot;as shot&quot;. Am I grossly mistaken? I ask because (a) some clipping here or there is the reason I&#039;ve deleted 95% of the BIF photos I&#039;ve captured, and (b) this is the primary reason for many of my &quot;beat yourself up for mistakes&quot; sessions after I return from the field :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Arthur,</p>
<p>Fabulous images!</p>
<p>I have a question about the edits: while background &#8220;cleanup&#8221; may be acceptable, should one really be doing any mods at all to the primary subject? I have been under the (possibly naive) impression that all wildlife images and flower images have the primary subject &#8220;as shot&#8221;. Am I grossly mistaken? I ask because (a) some clipping here or there is the reason I&#8217;ve deleted 95% of the BIF photos I&#8217;ve captured, and (b) this is the primary reason for many of my &#8220;beat yourself up for mistakes&#8221; sessions after I return from the field 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
