<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SONY or Nikon?  Can you judge the Image Quality?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/14/59706/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/14/59706/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2019 12:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Lamar May		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/14/59706/comment-page-1/#comment-1761659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lamar May]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2019 13:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=59706#comment-1761659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought image #1 was slightly sharper, with a bit more detail in the feathers and around the head area. Plus the color of the rock in image #1 looks more natural to me.....image #2 has a slight color cast showing in the rock in my mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought image #1 was slightly sharper, with a bit more detail in the feathers and around the head area. Plus the color of the rock in image #1 looks more natural to me&#8230;..image #2 has a slight color cast showing in the rock in my mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Loffredo		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/14/59706/comment-page-1/#comment-1761600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Loffredo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2019 17:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=59706#comment-1761600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Arthur,    I cannot tell any difference.  Both look great to me.  I can only assume you shot both wide-open, and using the Nikon D850 &#038; 500PF at f5.6 in #2 and the Sony with the 100-400 &#038; 1.4TC in #1.  I believe that would produce about a similar depth of field to keep the comparison fair.  Or it&#039;s the opposite and you used the F-stops to trick us.      I assume there is no cropping, so I wonder if it would make any difference if the subject was much further away and you had to do a decent crop?  I would think the more MP would be better.  ??   On that topic, I&#039;d also love to hear your thoughts on the Sony A7r3 for BIF.  Is the A7r3 a significant step-up in autofocus from Canon/Nikon with the benefit of 42mp for cropping and a cheaper price point. ??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur,    I cannot tell any difference.  Both look great to me.  I can only assume you shot both wide-open, and using the Nikon D850 &amp; 500PF at f5.6 in #2 and the Sony with the 100-400 &amp; 1.4TC in #1.  I believe that would produce about a similar depth of field to keep the comparison fair.  Or it&#8217;s the opposite and you used the F-stops to trick us.      I assume there is no cropping, so I wonder if it would make any difference if the subject was much further away and you had to do a decent crop?  I would think the more MP would be better.  ??   On that topic, I&#8217;d also love to hear your thoughts on the Sony A7r3 for BIF.  Is the A7r3 a significant step-up in autofocus from Canon/Nikon with the benefit of 42mp for cropping and a cheaper price point. ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
