Comments on: Which One was the SONY Image? Which One was the Nikon Image? https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/18/which-one-was-the-sony-image-which-one-was-the-nikon-image/ The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris Sun, 07 Apr 2019 12:33:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Arthur Morris/BIRDS AS ART https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/18/which-one-was-the-sony-image-which-one-was-the-nikon-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1761754 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 13:53:23 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=59747#comment-1761754 In reply to Mick.

Hi Nick,0 fi

Yes, opinion on which was the higher quality image was pretty much split. I am glad that in the eyes of some folks the SONY A9 file was at least comparable with the D850 file. And yes again, differences in the post-processing of even similar images can vary greatly.

I am in the process of switching to (and loving) Capture One v.11 exclusively for my Nikon and SONY images. I have never used the Nikon software to process a RAW (NEF) file.

with love, artie

]]> By: Mick https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2019/02/18/which-one-was-the-sony-image-which-one-was-the-nikon-image/comment-page-1/#comment-1761753 Sat, 23 Feb 2019 13:45:52 +0000 http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=59747#comment-1761753 I don’t know why, but when I’d seen the original post, I had felt that the feet and eyes were sharper in the second image which turned out to be the Nikon. But as you said none of this matters more than the skill of the person handling it.

Artie, do you prefer Capture 1 to ACR and Nikon’s own processing software?

]]>