<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Used SONY Bodies for Sale (not mine!) Join Me at DeSoto. A Brand New Plumage for Me! Adding Canvas with Choppy Water. And an Exposure Fine-Point Question	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2020/12/16/used-sony-bodies-for-sale-a-brand-new-plumage-for-me-adding-canvas-with-choppy-water-and-an-exposure-fine-point-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2020/12/16/used-sony-bodies-for-sale-a-brand-new-plumage-for-me-adding-canvas-with-choppy-water-and-an-exposure-fine-point-question/</link>
	<description>The blog of bird photographer Arthur Morris</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2025 15:43:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel Eade		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2020/12/16/used-sony-bodies-for-sale-a-brand-new-plumage-for-me-adding-canvas-with-choppy-water-and-an-exposure-fine-point-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1807094</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Eade]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:27:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=70594#comment-1807094</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the exposure question I can think of a couple of reasons why the exposure might be different. I noticed you had increased the ISO from 640 to 800 and then the shutter speed from 1/2000 to 1/2500 and kept the aperture @ f/9.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;You just pointed out that the exposure for the two images was identical: ISO 640 -- 1/2000 sec. at f/9 equals ISO 800 -- 1/2500 sec. at f/9. I was so busy trying to show everyone how smart I was that I screwed up :)&lt;/font&gt; 

The higher shutter speed needed for flight imaging is one factor but also the Juvi has some brown &quot;splotches&quot; on its back whereas the adult body is all white therefore it requires less light for proper exposure.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;The latter had been my intent :( 

with love, artie&lt;/font&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the exposure question I can think of a couple of reasons why the exposure might be different. I noticed you had increased the ISO from 640 to 800 and then the shutter speed from 1/2000 to 1/2500 and kept the aperture @ f/9.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>You just pointed out that the exposure for the two images was identical: ISO 640 &#8212; 1/2000 sec. at f/9 equals ISO 800 &#8212; 1/2500 sec. at f/9. I was so busy trying to show everyone how smart I was that I screwed up 🙂</font> </p>
<p>The higher shutter speed needed for flight imaging is one factor but also the Juvi has some brown &#8220;splotches&#8221; on its back whereas the adult body is all white therefore it requires less light for proper exposure.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>The latter had been my intent 🙁 </p>
<p>with love, artie</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Peake		</title>
		<link>https://www.birdsasart-blog.com/baa/2020/12/16/used-sony-bodies-for-sale-a-brand-new-plumage-for-me-adding-canvas-with-choppy-water-and-an-exposure-fine-point-question/comment-page-1/#comment-1807091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Peake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.birdsasart-blog.com/?p=70594#comment-1807091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Artie,

You commented that you pushed the shutter button during the action without taking extra time to get everything perfect.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;That is correct.&lt;/font&gt;

At the exposure you used (being 1 stop under) 

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;One stop under what?  I did screw up -- see my replies to Joel Eade above) but I do not think that I said &quot;1 stop under.&quot;&lt;/font&gt;

comparing with the image of the juvenile did you go to a higher shutter speed because of the flight action as opposed to the juvenile swimming?

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;Probably. &lt;/font&gt;

I do enjoy trying to nut out these exposure questions.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;Do see what I wrote to Joel.  It is hard to do when the guy asking the question screwed up :) &lt;/font&gt;

Best wishes for the Christmas season. Merry Christmas.
David.

&lt;font id=comreply&gt;Thanks and ditto, with love, artie&lt;/font&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Artie,</p>
<p>You commented that you pushed the shutter button during the action without taking extra time to get everything perfect.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>That is correct.</font></p>
<p>At the exposure you used (being 1 stop under) </p>
<p><font id=comreply>One stop under what?  I did screw up &#8212; see my replies to Joel Eade above) but I do not think that I said &#8220;1 stop under.&#8221;</font></p>
<p>comparing with the image of the juvenile did you go to a higher shutter speed because of the flight action as opposed to the juvenile swimming?</p>
<p><font id=comreply>Probably. </font></p>
<p>I do enjoy trying to nut out these exposure questions.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>Do see what I wrote to Joel.  It is hard to do when the guy asking the question screwed up 🙂 </font></p>
<p>Best wishes for the Christmas season. Merry Christmas.<br />
David.</p>
<p><font id=comreply>Thanks and ditto, with love, artie</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
